2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02715-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unenhanced MRI of the abdomen and pelvis for surveillance of patients with stage 1 testicular cancer post-radical orchiectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings align with observational studies indicating that MRI, with experienced radiologists, is a safe alternative in this setting. [26][27][28] Numbers of advanced relapses on MRI were too small to assess center variation. Independent central scan review (to be reported separately) will provide further insights into impact of radiologist experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings align with observational studies indicating that MRI, with experienced radiologists, is a safe alternative in this setting. [26][27][28] Numbers of advanced relapses on MRI were too small to assess center variation. Independent central scan review (to be reported separately) will provide further insights into impact of radiologist experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mosavi et al demonstrated the feasibility of WB-MRI with DWI for the follow-up of patients with testicular cancer and the added value of DWI [22]. A recent study showed that unenhanced MRI of the abdomen and pelvis is an adequate tool for surveillance of stage I testicular cancer [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] Experience with MRI in the staging of the retroperitoneal lymph nodes is substantially less than CT and has a sensitivity of 78-98%. [7][8][9][10] There is inadequate evidence to support the use of MRI of the abdomen and pelvis over a CT scan at the time of diagnosis. In general, the smaller the size definition of a positive node, the greater the sensitivity and lesser the specificity.…”
Section: Guideline Statement Updatesmentioning
confidence: 99%