2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unemployment and the real exchange rate in Latin America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
109
0
17

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
109
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Between 2000 and 2008, the mining industry added formal jobs at an annual rate of 8.1 percent, the manufacturing industry at an annual average rate of 5.2 percent and the agriculture and fishing sector at an annual rate of 3.6 percent. The experience of Brazil confirms the findings of Frenkel and Ros (2006), in their study of 17 Latin American countries during the period [1990][1991][1992][1993][1994][1995][1996][1997][1998][1999][2000][2001][2002], that there is a significant and positive relationship between the movements in the real exchange rate and the rate of unemployment. 1 9 9 1 1 9 9 2 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 1 9 9 5 1 9 9 6 1 9 9 7 1 9 9 8 1 9 9 9 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 5 2 0 0 6 2 0 0 7 2 0 0 8…”
Section: What Explains the Rise In Formalization?supporting
confidence: 77%
“…Between 2000 and 2008, the mining industry added formal jobs at an annual rate of 8.1 percent, the manufacturing industry at an annual average rate of 5.2 percent and the agriculture and fishing sector at an annual rate of 3.6 percent. The experience of Brazil confirms the findings of Frenkel and Ros (2006), in their study of 17 Latin American countries during the period [1990][1991][1992][1993][1994][1995][1996][1997][1998][1999][2000][2001][2002], that there is a significant and positive relationship between the movements in the real exchange rate and the rate of unemployment. 1 9 9 1 1 9 9 2 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 1 9 9 5 1 9 9 6 1 9 9 7 1 9 9 8 1 9 9 9 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 5 2 0 0 6 2 0 0 7 2 0 0 8…”
Section: What Explains the Rise In Formalization?supporting
confidence: 77%
“…In addition, capital flows can have significantly negative effects on investment in tradable goods sectors through changing relative prices, which partly explain the decreasing business savings and employment contraction in these sectors (Frenkel and Ros, 2006). In addition, excess volatility in exchange rates raises inflation uncertainty and encourages financial investments by real sector firms (Felix, 1998;UNCTAD, 2006).…”
Section: Financial Liberalization Uncertainty and Private Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Frenkel and Ros (2006) and Thorbecke and Zhang (2009), we use RER and the foreign country's income to explain the effect of RER effect on bilateral export. To increase the sample size and reflect the current situation, we use monthly data.…”
Section: Which Path Of Rmb Appreciation Is Desirable In the Future?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In China, policymakers worry about the negative effects of RMB appreciation on export and employment, as simulated and proven by Frenkel and Ros (2006), Zhang and Fung (2006), and Thorbecke and Zhang (2009). In addition, policymakers do not have enough knowledge on how to appreciate RMB in the long run.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%