1997
DOI: 10.1257/jep.11.3.55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unemployment and Labor Market Rigidities: Europe versus North America

Abstract: The received wisdom tells us that the rigidity and inflexibility of European job markets relative to that in the United States is the reason why Europe has high unemployment. This paper argues that this broad brush analysis is simply too vague to be useful. Indeed it is probably positively misleading. Many labor market institutions that conventionally come under the heading of rigidities have no observable impact on unemployment and may otherwise serve a useful purpose.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

48
1,084
3
63

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,526 publications
(1,198 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
48
1,084
3
63
Order By: Relevance
“…The monthly exit rates from unemployment p(θ) are from the OECD unemployment duration database. The benefit replacement rates ρ come from Nickell (1997), except for the Italian rate which has been updated using Office of Policy (2002). The interest rate is set at 4 percent annually.…”
Section: A2 Renegotiation Of the Severance Paymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monthly exit rates from unemployment p(θ) are from the OECD unemployment duration database. The benefit replacement rates ρ come from Nickell (1997), except for the Italian rate which has been updated using Office of Policy (2002). The interest rate is set at 4 percent annually.…”
Section: A2 Renegotiation Of the Severance Paymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of owner-occupation might therefore be an important factor omitted in empirical studies of unemployment. In fact, the fit of Nickell's (1997) regression to explain equilibrium unemployment improves considerably -the R 2 rises from .76 to .82 -when he adds the proportion of home-ownership as a proxy for mobility to the list of explanatory variables. The estimated coefficient of this variable implies that a 10 percentage point rise in the owner-occupation rate is associated with an additional 1.3 percentage points of the unemployment rate.…”
Section: Links Between Housing and Labor Markets -Stylized Facts And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with this statement is the result of a recent paper by Nickell (1997) which does not find a satisfactory empirical explanation when estimating how labor market rigidities, the treatment of he unemployed,taxes, union coverage, union and employer co-ordination in wage bargaining -all key factors in prominent models -impact on unemployment. Nickell (1997) remarks that both geographical and occupational mobility of workers seem to be higher in the United States than in Europe where unemployment is higher. But he does not explore its causes any further, nor does he discuss the dimension of the role mobility could play as an explanatory variable in unemployment equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…See, for example, Nickell (1997) for a cross-country empirical analysis. Empirical work in the United States has shown convincingly that the duration of unemployment benefits significantly affects unemployment spells (see Meyer 1990).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%