Une étude interactionnelle de la grammaire : la dislocation à droite évaluative dans la parole-en-interaction

Stefani, Elwys De; Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie

doi:10.3917/rfla.222.0015

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 68 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This may be done by determining the relationship between the speaker and audience, by defining the role of each participant, or by using specific verbal utterances to create a situation where their goals are materialized. As such, to understand the construction of discourse it is necessary to consider participants (who is speaking to whom), space and time (where and when), and goals (for what purpose) (De Stefani & Horlacher, 2017;Kern, 2015;Linell, 2009;Norris, 2011;Picard, 1992). These elements will be defined further below.…”

Section: Participant Identity Space Time and Goalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating Representation Ethos Émotif in 2007 French Presidential Election

Firmonasari

Syabana²

2020

kata

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The issue of immigration became prominent in French political discourse in 2005 that leads to debate about France and nationalism. During the lead-up to the 2007 French Presidential election, various concepts of a French national identity were promoted by candidates: Nicolas Sarkozy, Ségolene Royal, François Bayrou, and Jean-Marie Le Pen. Candidates gave particular attention to ethos, specifically ethos émotif. In this article, the researcher will characterize the ethos émotif presented by the four candidates mentioned above. The ethos will be then examined whether it were successfully embodied in these candidates' speeches by investigating the public reaction they received based on articles published in the French media. This research will apply a critical discourse analysis and interactional sociolinguistics approach using elements of interaction formulated by Stébe (2008) and Kerbrat-Orecchioni (1990). Data will be classified using the software LEXICO 3.

show abstract

Section: Participant Identity Space Time and Goalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating Representation Ethos Émotif in 2007 French Presidential Election

Firmonasari

Syabana²

2020

kata

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Surprise questions in English and French

Celle

2023

Open Linguistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this article is to show that a specific type of non-canonical question, namely surprise questions, needs to be defined in its own right and differentiated from rhetorical questions. The communicative function of surprise questions is explained on the basis of three constructions – what the hell questions in English, qu’est-ce que questions, and c’est quoi ce N (i.e. an in situ interrogative followed by a right dislocation) in French. Surprise questions are reported to be expressive and to request an explanation for or a change in an activity judged to be incongruous. However, only the intensification conveyed by the hell systematically guarantees the expressive reading. In French, the surprise reading is argued to rely on a combination of syntactic structure, prosodic features, and lexical items. While qu’est-ce que questions are syntactically more complex and diverse, the in situ construction followed by a right dislocation allows for the surprise reading to be more readily identified as such.

show abstract

Décrire la syntaxe dans les interactions du quotidien : objectifs et implications dans l’enseignement et l’apprentissage du français langue étrangère

André,

Etienne

2023

Travaux De Linguistique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Alors que les travaux de Claire Blanche-Benveniste ont insufflé un nouvel élan aux recherches sur le français parlé au quotidien, trop longtemps évalué comme chaotique et manquant d’organisation, les résultats de ces études n’ont pas encore bénéficié à l’enseignement du français langue étrangère (FLE). Celui-ci continue à s’appuyer sur des grammaires basées sur des exemples construits, en isolant des structures syntaxiques qui ne sont pas toujours attestées en interaction. Ainsi, ces grammaires ne vont pas transmettre un véritable savoir-faire qui se révèle pourtant indispensable à l’apprenant pour comprendre les mécanismes de l’oral en contexte. Nous illustrons ce constat en soulignant la variété et la fréquence de structures syntaxiques particulières en interaction permettant de réaliser des fonctions pragmatiques courantes. Nous nous intéresserons ensuite à leur co-construction par plusieurs locuteurs puis au cas particulier de la question. C’est pour rendre accessible cette variété de pratiques en contexte que nous avons développé, avec un réseau de didacticiens, des ressources adaptées aux besoins en FLE, et que nous recommandons des solutions pour les mobiliser et les articuler en situation de classe.

show abstract

Une étude interactionnelle de la grammaire : la dislocation à droite évaluative dans la parole-en-interaction

Cited by 4 publications

References 68 publications

Investigating Representation Ethos Émotif in 2007 French Presidential Election

Investigating Representation Ethos Émotif in 2007 French Presidential Election

Surprise questions in English and French

Décrire la syntaxe dans les interactions du quotidien : objectifs et implications dans l’enseignement et l’apprentissage du français langue étrangère

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About