2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648x/ab6ae8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Undulated silicene and germanene freestanding layers: why not?

Abstract: Silicene and germanene freestanding layers are usually described as a honeycomb lattice formed by two hexagonal sub-lattices presenting a height difference, namely the layer buckling. In this work, first-principles calculations show that silicene and germanene can be rippled at 0 K with various wavelengths, without any compressive strain of the layer. For germanene, the height difference between two Ge atoms from the same sub-lattice can be as high as 4.7 Å for an undulation length of 81 Å. The deformations ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 61 ] An energy cutoff of 400 eV was chosen for the plane‐wave expansion of the wave functions throughout the calculations. [ 62 ] The Monkhorst–Pack scheme was employed for all Brillouin zone integrations with 3 × 3 × 1 and 6 × 6 × 1 k‐meshes for the geometry optimization and density of states calculations. [ 63 ] For structural relaxation, the convergence criterion of energy was taken as 1.0 × 10 −5 eV, and the Hellmann–Feynman force on each atom was set to less than 0.01 eV Å −1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 61 ] An energy cutoff of 400 eV was chosen for the plane‐wave expansion of the wave functions throughout the calculations. [ 62 ] The Monkhorst–Pack scheme was employed for all Brillouin zone integrations with 3 × 3 × 1 and 6 × 6 × 1 k‐meshes for the geometry optimization and density of states calculations. [ 63 ] For structural relaxation, the convergence criterion of energy was taken as 1.0 × 10 −5 eV, and the Hellmann–Feynman force on each atom was set to less than 0.01 eV Å −1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 During the calculations, a 400 eV energy cutoff was utilized for the plane-wave expansion of the wave functions. 54 For geometry optimization and density of states calculations, 3 Â 3 Â 1 and 6 Â 6 Â 1 kmeshes were utilized for all Brillouin zone integrations according to the Monkhorst-Pack scheme. 55 For structural relaxation, the convergence energy criterion was set to 1.0 Â 10 À5 eV, and the Hellmann-Feynman force on each atom was set to less than 0.01 eV/Å.…”
Section: Computational Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our DFT calculations, the vdW interactions were confirmed using the DFT‐D3 method 53 . During the calculations, a 400 eV energy cutoff was utilized for the plane‐wave expansion of the wave functions 54 . For geometry optimization and density of states calculations, 3 × 3 × 1 and 6 × 6 × 1 k‐meshes were utilized for all Brillouin zone integrations according to the Monkhorst–Pack scheme.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrogenated [38], halogenated [39], alkalized [40], aluminized [41] or oxidized [42] graphene systems are examples of those compounds. Recent researches on silicene-based materials cover some isolated experimental [43] and theoretical works [44]. For example, the rare-earth adlayers on silicene surface exhibit unusual transition of the anti-ferromagnetic and ferromagnetic configurations during a decrease of the adlayer thickness [45], and a two-dimensional magnet is realized from buckled silicene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%