2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Undrained bearing capacity factors for ring footings in heterogeneous soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
17
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…mechanism in each case is also indicated in the last column of the table. It can be observed that the values of N c from the present study are found to be close and a little bit smaller than the results of Lee et al [8] and Remadna et al [7]. It can be observed that for strip (r i /r o = 1) and circular (r i /r o = 0) footings, the N c values from the present study lie between the corresponding values of the lower and upper bound results of Kumar and Chakraborty [6].…”
Section: Results and Comparisonscontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…mechanism in each case is also indicated in the last column of the table. It can be observed that the values of N c from the present study are found to be close and a little bit smaller than the results of Lee et al [8] and Remadna et al [7]. It can be observed that for strip (r i /r o = 1) and circular (r i /r o = 0) footings, the N c values from the present study lie between the corresponding values of the lower and upper bound results of Kumar and Chakraborty [6].…”
Section: Results and Comparisonscontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…It can be observed that for strip (r i /r o = 1) and circular (r i /r o = 0) footings, the N c values from the present study lie between the corresponding values of the lower and upper bound results of Kumar and Chakraborty [6]. For intermediate values of r i /r o , however, the results from the present study, Lee et al [8] and Remadna et al [7] are seen to be greater than the upper bound results of Kumar and Chakraborty [6]. This is attributed to the fact that the analysis of Kumar and Chakraborty [6] is based on the assumption that the value of r h remains always equal to the minor principal stress.…”
Section: Results and Comparisonssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The ring footing is specified with inner and outer radii R i and R 0 , respectively. In this study, five inner-to-outer radius ratios (R i /R 0 = 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8) are investigated, which covers most problems of practical interest [17]. The footing roughness is assumed to be perfectly rough, which does not permit any relative movement at all along the soil-footing interface.…”
Section: Geometry and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%