Undoing segmentation? Latin American health care policy during the economic boom

Abstract

For all the agreement regarding the segmented character of Latin America's social policy, few studies define it clearly, let alone suggest exact ways to measure it. This article provides a more precise definition based on a threefold policy output comprising coverage, generosity, and equity. Empirically, the article explores the cross‐national variation in segmentation in health care within Latin America in 2000 and 2013, before and after Latin America's economic boom. The article clusters countries, evaluates which ones improved their relative position during the 2000s, and determines the overall level of segmentation in the region. Findings are twofold. First, we identify three clusters: countries that respectively do particularly well and poorly across policy dimensions in 2000 and 2013, and a smaller set of countries that improved significantly, particularly regarding coverage and generosity. Second, despite cross‐national differences, there are shared regional challenges—the risk of catastrophic expenditure being a case in point. Our analysis demonstrates the need to move beyond coverage as a policy goal and pay more attention to gaps in generosity in every country. We also call for better indicators to measure performance beyond coverage across countries, and more studies that explain the similarities and differences between countries that improved considerably during the 2000s.

Child‐centered social policies in Argentina: Expansion, segmentation, and social stratification

“…This is related to Martínez Franzoni and Sánchez‐Ancochea's approach (, ). However, while these authors also include generosity as a measure of segmentation, here I only refer to it in terms of the variation in benefits amounts or service quality across existing systems and population groups.…”

What matters in health (care) universes: delusions, dilutions, and ways towards universal health justice

“…The much-touted Pink Tide of socialist-leaning or social democratic movements, political parties, and elected governments used sizeable commodity-boom earnings to invest in a host of policies aimed at improving living and working conditions (thereby improving health)—from living wages to the enforcement of labor laws, and including greater access (and in some cases rights) to healthcare services. Concerted progressive policies ranged from anti-poverty programs such as non conditional cash transfers3 (Uruguay), to integrated nutrition, primary health care, and cash-transfer programs (Brazil), progressive tax reforms and a unified public health insurance financing pool (Uruguay), neighborhood-based primary-care clinics (Venezuela), intercultural healthcare services (Bolivia), and increased access to an integrated network of health services and effective intersectoral actions for health (El Salvador) [33].…”

Tackling Complex Inequalities and Ecuador's Buen Vivir: Leaving No‐one Behind and Equality in Diversity

“…After a decade of reforms Ecuador has constructed a distinctive ‘policy architecture’ (Martínez‐Franzoni, ). Moving from the pluralised Constituent Assembly, with numerous – often incompatible – interpretations of sumak kawsay‐buen vivir, into statecraft and planning entailed the construction of state‐defined Buen Vivir.…”

“…‘Post‐neoliberal’ social policy and its complex dis/continuities with neoliberal policy garner significant scholarly attention regarding effects on poverty, inequality and social differentiation (Molyneux, ; Gideon and Molyneux, ; Martínez‐Franzoni, ). Here, by contrast, Ecuador's state BV is brought into conversation with global Sustainable Development Goals for poverty alleviation and human‐environmental thriving.…”