This study examines whether the percentage of retail ownership of a firm is associated with the likelihood that the firm is subject to monitoring and enforcement by the two largest divisions of the SEC. We find a negative association between retail ownership percentage and SEC monitoring. In contrast, we find a positive association between retail ownership percentage and SEC enforcement. We acknowledge that the objective function of the SEC in terms of monitoring and enforcement of corporate registrants is complex and nuanced, and we do not contend that these associations are at all causal. However, the results suggest that the SEC is less likely to monitor firms with high retail ownership, potentially leaving retail investors more vulnerable to unresolved financial reporting issues. At the same time, the SEC is more likely to enforce upon firms with high retail ownership, potentially harming retail investors when the firm is accused of egregious cases of perceived financial misreporting.