2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2014.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Undirected graphs of Hermitian matrices that admit only two distinct eigenvalues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the second case of the proof importantly uses the theory of DM matrices described in [4]. The proof of the first case cannot be adapted to the second case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the second case of the proof importantly uses the theory of DM matrices described in [4]. The proof of the first case cannot be adapted to the second case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It turns out that cloning a vertex of a graph G with MB(G) = k results in a graph G with MB(G ) ≤ k. The following proposition is proved in Theorem 6.3 of [13], it is also implied by Corollary 4 of [2]. In [13], this is used to characterize graphs G with MB(G) = by constructing minimal such graphs (these are K , K ∪ K , K , , K , ,..., and K , ,..., , ) and constructing all the other such graphs by cloning vertices in the minimal graphs.…”
Section: Lemma 33 For Any Graph G With No Isolated Vertices and Formentioning
confidence: 91%
“…is the closed neighbourhood of v (that is, a neighbourhood of v containing v). It turns out that cloning a vertex of a graph G with M B(G) = k results in a graph G ′ with M B(G ′ ) ≤ k. The following proposition is proved in Theorem 6.3 of [12], it is also implied by Corollary 4 of [1]. In [12], this is used to characterize graphs G with M B(G) = 2 by constructing minimal such graphs (these are K 1 , K 1 ∪ K 1 , K 2,1 , K 2,2,...,2 and K 2,2,...,2,1 ) and constructing all the other such graphs by cloning vertices in the minimal graphs.…”
Section: Complete Multipartite Graphsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The first statement is trivial. The second statement has appeared in [7,12,13,15]. The third statement is known (for example, there is a proof in [13]), but we include a proof for completeness.…”
Section: Graphs With Two Distinct Eigenvaluesmentioning
confidence: 99%