2017
DOI: 10.1111/acem.13229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Undetectable Concentrations of a Food and Drug Administration–approved High‐sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Assay to Rule Out Acute Myocardial Infarction at Emergency Department Arrival

Abstract: BackgroundThe objective of this study was to quantify the sensitivity of very low concentrations of high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) at ED arrival for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in a large cohort of chest pain patients evaluated in real‐world clinical practice.MethodsThis retrospective study included consecutive ED patients with suspected cardiac chest pain evaluated in four urban EDs, excluding those with ST‐elevation AMI, cardiac arrest or abnormal kidney function. The primary outcomes were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 552 (22.6%) patients had one or more troponin readings ≥ 10 ng/L. This was associated with both 30 The cut-off of hsTnT at 50 ng/L, which corresponded to conventional troponin T (Roche Diagnostics) of 30 ng/L (10% CV precision of assay), gave PPVs of approximately 70% for 30-day and one-year MACE (Table II). There were 42 (25.3%) patients with hsTnT ≥ 50 ng/L at any one reading (i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 552 (22.6%) patients had one or more troponin readings ≥ 10 ng/L. This was associated with both 30 The cut-off of hsTnT at 50 ng/L, which corresponded to conventional troponin T (Roche Diagnostics) of 30 ng/L (10% CV precision of assay), gave PPVs of approximately 70% for 30-day and one-year MACE (Table II). There were 42 (25.3%) patients with hsTnT ≥ 50 ng/L at any one reading (i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(29) As a rule-out strategy, hsTnT alone is still not sufficient for the purposes of identifying patients with high risk of MACE, and should be combined with assessment of other clinical factors. (30) Variables identified from multivariate logistic regression analysis as independent predictors of MACE other than hsTnT include: presentation with history of radiation of pain to both arms, pain relieved by rest, presence of diaphoresis, history of smoking and serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels ≥ 3.4 mmol/L. Alternative strategies also include investigating the use of hsTnT when used with other biomarkers, such as soluble isoform of suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), which has been shown to be useful in prognosticating 30-day cardiac mortality among ED patients with chest pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously published studies using this cohort have validated the test characteristics of an undetectable hs-cTnT concentration at ED arrival as a universal (i.e., not sex-specific) cut-off to rule out acute MI. 6 A secondary analysis was performed on a subsample of 722 patients with hs-cTnT concentrations measured at 2-hour intervals to validate published 2-hour rapid diagnostic algorithms. 11…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The limit of quantitation approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 6 ng/L, can achieve similar high diagnostic sensitivity for MI. 6 Sex-specific diagnostic cut-offs for high-sensitivity troponin assays have been proposed for ruling-in MI. [7][8][9][10] In the rule-in scenario, sex-specific cut-offs improve diagnostic specificity and classification performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is a large body of research demonstrating the high sensitivity of very low hs-cTn thresholds on presentation to exclude index AMI for patients with chest pain presenting to the ED, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] there is less research examining the exclusion of 30-day AMI and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). 22 Moreover, many of the multicenter hs-cTn studies to date have been conducted in Europe or Australasia, relying on samples processed by a single core laboratory (likely representing optimal assay performance), and their results may not be generalizable to everyday clinical practice.…”
Section: R Esum Ementioning
confidence: 99%