Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1988
DOI: 10.1121/1.396047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underwater noises: Statistical modeling, detection, and normalization

Abstract: Knowledge of the noise probability density function (PDF) is central in signal detection problems, not only for optimum receiver structures, but also for processing procedures such as power normalization. Unfortunately, the statistical knowledge must be acquired since the classical assumption of a Gaussian noise PDF is often not valid in underwater acoustics. In this article, statistical modeling is studied using a Gaussian–Gaussian mixture (GGM) for three different underwater noise data sets. It is shown that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To provide a consistent and controlled investigation of the robustness of object detection algorithms under varying signalto-noise ratio (SNR) conditions, we introduced an artificial deterioration of the SNR using Normally-distributed random noise. This method is commonly employed in simulations to approximate the random noise typically found in real-world environments and is very similar to models that aim to model the spectrum of background noise underwater [35]. Further, as can been seen in Figure 4, this distribution also fits the TS distribution observed in our experiment.…”
Section: B Detection Accuracy In the Presence Of Noisesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…To provide a consistent and controlled investigation of the robustness of object detection algorithms under varying signalto-noise ratio (SNR) conditions, we introduced an artificial deterioration of the SNR using Normally-distributed random noise. This method is commonly employed in simulations to approximate the random noise typically found in real-world environments and is very similar to models that aim to model the spectrum of background noise underwater [35]. Further, as can been seen in Figure 4, this distribution also fits the TS distribution observed in our experiment.…”
Section: B Detection Accuracy In the Presence Of Noisesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The results highlight the dominating frequency components in radiated noise as well as its contributing sources like engine and auxiliaries. Bouvet and Schwartz [12], from the statistical study conducted on underwater noises, state that the underwater background noise characteristics are very similar to Gaussian and the vessel noise can be effectively described by a Gaussian mixture model. Supriya et al [13] propose a method based on spectral subtraction for alleviating the acoustic ambient noise with underwater acoustic receivers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed HMM classifier system incorporates a prototype communication system wholly for the purpose of estimating the Rayleigh fading, thereby compensating the ill effects induced in the signals by underwater channel [4]. The Rayleigh fading model represented by ( 7) is modeled using an AR method as in ( 8), ( 9), ( 10), (11), and (12) and is assumed to provide a fading effect closer to the actual one. This Rayleigh fading model is integrated in the prototype communication system for compensating the channel fading effects.…”
Section: Gammatone Cepstralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, various noise models have been introduced to model noise with non-Gaussian characteristics [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Back in 1988, M. Bouvet [8] used Gaussian-Gaussian mixture (GGM) and Middleton Class-A models to describe underwater noise data. The two models showed better results than Gaussian model, but GGM was suitable for noise which is close to Gaussian and Middleton Class-A model was too strict to use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%