2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underwater localization using single beacon measurements: Observability analysis for a double integrator system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…De Palma et al (2017) address observability for the single beacon navigation problem of an UV using a nonlinear, kinematic “double integrator” model with acceleration as the model input and range to a stationary beacon as the output. The observability analysis addresses two complementary issues: the local weak observability for the nonlinear system, and, similar to Parlangeli and Indiveri (2014), the global observability for a LTV representation of the system derived through a state augmentation method.…”
Section: Literature Review: Uv Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Palma et al (2017) address observability for the single beacon navigation problem of an UV using a nonlinear, kinematic “double integrator” model with acceleration as the model input and range to a stationary beacon as the output. The observability analysis addresses two complementary issues: the local weak observability for the nonlinear system, and, similar to Parlangeli and Indiveri (2014), the global observability for a LTV representation of the system derived through a state augmentation method.…”
Section: Literature Review: Uv Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenges of dealing with single range measurements come from the fact that they are a non-linear algebraic map of the vehicles' positions hence the observability analysis requires the tools of local and weakly local observability (Hermann and Krener, 1977 ), but this approach suffers from several difficulties (Gadre and Stilwell, 2004 ; Ross and Jouffroy, 2005 ; Jouffroy and Reger, 2006 ). However, an alternative approach has been recently investigated recurring to a reformulation of the problem, which requires the observability of a linear time varying system (see, e.g., Batista et al, 2011 ; De Palma et al, 2017 ) so that a number of useless drawbacks of the local approach are avoided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the research of robotic navigation in two-dimensional space has achieved great results and extended to the study of multirobot systems [8], while during underwater navigation, AUVs cannot rely on Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs) due to the attenuation of electromagnetic radiation in the water domain, and in the absence of specific positioning systems, they can exclusively relay on dead-reckoning techniques. As the latter approaches integrate noisy and biased measurements from Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) and velocity sensors, they suffer from numerical drift that makes them usable only for relatively short periods [9]. And the inertial navigation system (INS) is also mostly applied on AUVs, but INS usually suffers from error accumulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, research efforts focused on position systems based on the use of range measurements to a single node with the aim of developing the solutions which is simple, cheap, and easy to operate. Such approaches, known in the literature as single beacon localization [9], single range localization [10], or range-only localization [11], are based on the fusion of range measurements to the single source with information from AUV's onboard sensors as Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU), Doppler Velocity Logger (DVL), and depth sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%