2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11041442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underwater Acoustic Target Recognition with a Residual Network and the Optimized Feature Extraction Method

Abstract: Underwater Acoustic Target Recognition (UATR) remains one of the most challenging tasks in underwater signal processing due to the lack of labeled data acquisition, the impact of the time-space varying intrinsic characteristics, and the interference from other noise sources. Although some deep learning methods have been proven to achieve state-of-the-art accuracy, the accuracy of the recognition task can be improved by designing a Residual Network and optimizing feature extraction. To give a more comprehensive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deep belief networks [33] were also applied to the same signals and obtained an accuracy up to 96.96%, while the overall accuracy of CNN models was 94.75%. Hong et al [34] used the ShipsEar acoustic database in order to train and classify underwater targets using an 18-layer residual network (ResNet18) combined with a feature extraction method based upon the use of the mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC) and log mel methods. The work achieved 94.3% in class accuracy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep belief networks [33] were also applied to the same signals and obtained an accuracy up to 96.96%, while the overall accuracy of CNN models was 94.75%. Hong et al [34] used the ShipsEar acoustic database in order to train and classify underwater targets using an 18-layer residual network (ResNet18) combined with a feature extraction method based upon the use of the mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC) and log mel methods. The work achieved 94.3% in class accuracy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the above CNN model extracts single-scale features with the fixed size of the convolution kernel, which lose a lot of feature information. Hong [ 14 ] proposes a deep convolution stack network with a multi-scale residual unit (MSRU) to extract multi-scale features while exploring using generative adversarial networks (GAN) to synthesize underwater acoustic waveforms. The method modifies two advanced GAN models and improves their performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [ 5 ] introduced slope entropy into underwater acoustic signal processing to obtain higher recognition rate. Hong et al [ 6 ] used fused features to train an 18-layer residual neural network containing the central loss function of the embedding layer (namely ResNet18 in this paper) and adopted various strategies to prevent model overfitting, which improved the accuracy to 94.3% on the ShipsEar dataset. Hong et al [ 6 ] used a joint loss function containing a central loss function to monitor the characteristics of different underwater acoustic targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hong et al [ 6 ] used fused features to train an 18-layer residual neural network containing the central loss function of the embedding layer (namely ResNet18 in this paper) and adopted various strategies to prevent model overfitting, which improved the accuracy to 94.3% on the ShipsEar dataset. Hong et al [ 6 ] used a joint loss function containing a central loss function to monitor the characteristics of different underwater acoustic targets. However, using the joint loss function will equally monitor all features, including ocean background noise and other interference information, reducing the network’s recognition effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%