Understating U. S. Strength

join(, Joseph S. Nye

doi:10.2307/1148823

Cited by 13 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Conversely, others have sounded the death knell for liberal globalization and American hegemony with the growing power and influence of China. Nye Jr. (2020) maintained that the idea of COVID‐19 paving the way to the “new world order” is overstated. This is corroborated by Pearson (2020) who marshaled DHL global connection statistics from 2001 to 2020 to show that the global connection index was above that of the 2008–2009 global financial crises.…”

Section: Covid‐19 and The Globalization Phenomenonmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As far as predicting the future of globalization in the post‐COVID world is concerned, practitioners and experts are largely divided. According to some researchers—such as Nye Jr. (2020), Pearson (2020), Altman and Bastian (2021), and many others—the existing world order will remain mostly unchanged. In fact, Nye Jr. (2020) contends that COVID‐19's putative role in spurring a “new world order” is exaggerated.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to some researchers—such as Nye Jr. (2020), Pearson (2020), Altman and Bastian (2021), and many others—the existing world order will remain mostly unchanged. In fact, Nye Jr. (2020) contends that COVID‐19's putative role in spurring a “new world order” is exaggerated. On the other hand, some researchers foretell the demise of the existing liberal international order in the wake of China's transition to a new world power in the post‐COVID era.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

State and politics in the transitional era of globalization: Twisting and turning toward authoritarian and hybrid regimes

Rahman,

Islam,

Gounjaria

2024

Politics & Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Beyond its discontented thesis, globalization has had a difficult time in the last few years, owing to the global financial crises of 2008–2009 when its vacuous premises and promises were widely contested for being an unfair deal. The recent rise of nationalist and populist movements across the West and the East, boosted by the COVID‐19 pandemic, now threatens its survival. However, globalization experts are largely divided in charting its future; while some predict the demise of the existing world order, others believe globalization will continue with some restructuring. By analyzing the global political dynamics and reviewing political and scholarly news and views, we argue that globalization is currently undergoing a transitional era with a new paradox—one characterized by the emergence of a multipolar world but with local identity and tradition‐based politics. The upshot is that the state with the border is re‐emerging alongside authoritarian and hybrid regimes.Related ArticlesKane, John, and Haig Patapan. 2010. “Recovering Justice: Political Legitimacy Reconsidered.” Politics & Policy 38(3): 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2010.00250.x.Quinn, Adam. 2007. “The Great Illusion: Chimeras of Isolationism and Realism in Post‐Iraq U.S. Foreign Policy.” Politics & Policy 35(3): 522–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2007.00071.x.Zaidi, Syed Muhammad Saad. 2021. “American Global Supremacy Under Threat? The Chinese Factor.” Politics & Policy 49(2): 502–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12402.

show abstract

Section: Covid‐19 and The Globalization Phenomenonmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

State and politics in the transitional era of globalization: Twisting and turning toward authoritarian and hybrid regimes

Rahman,

Islam,

Gounjaria

2024

Politics & Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As seen in the Shangri-La Dialogue of 2018, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said, ‘India does not see the Indo-Pacific Region as a strategy or a club of limited members’ (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Indian Government, 2018). Recently, Joseph S. Nye (2019) said, ‘Donald Trump’s long-term impact on US foreign policy is uncertain’. These phenomena confirmed observers’ early judgement of Trump’s uncertainty.…”

Section: Characterisation Of Political Leadershipmentioning

confidence: 99%

IR Moral Realism’s Epistemology

Xuetong

2020

India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Leadership and the Rise of Great Powers received 16 book reviews within 6 months of its publication. Among them, the one by Professor Rajesh Rajagopalan (which appeared in the India Quarterly, 75:3) is the most academically and theoretically compelling. I highly appreciate his sincere theoretical critiques that encourage me to rethink my theory. His review inspired me to have a written conversation with him about the epistemology of the international relations (IR) theory of moral realism.

show abstract

“…At about the same time Robert Keohane and JosephNye ( 1985 ) wrote about the retreat from multilateralism as evinced in the ebbing of national support for the international regimes the United States had helped to build in the early post -World War II era . See , for example , Haas ( 1988 ) , Huntington(1988 -89) ,and Nye (1988 ). Others who have disputed the alleged decline of American power include Gill ( 1986 ) ,Russett (1985 ) , and Strange ( 1987 ).3.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%