1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.1988.tb01034.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UNDERSTANDINGS OF ‘DEVELOPMENT’: AN ARENA OF STRUGGLE: The story of a development project in Zambia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, such institutions open up new arenas for contestation, rivalry and positioning. Often old rivalries are sharpened and fought out and new alliances or power constellations may be formed, challenging old-established social positions of control and power (Bierschenk 1988;Crehan and Von Oppen 1988;Elwert and Bierschenk 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the contrary, such institutions open up new arenas for contestation, rivalry and positioning. Often old rivalries are sharpened and fought out and new alliances or power constellations may be formed, challenging old-established social positions of control and power (Bierschenk 1988;Crehan and Von Oppen 1988;Elwert and Bierschenk 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 This article is based on the assumption that externally supported institutions open new 'arenas' for struggle over resources (see, e.g., Bierschenk 1988;Crehan and Von Oppen 1988;Elwert and Bierschenk 1988;IBRD 1996). In this context the concept of an arena refers to 'social locations or situations in which contests over issues, resources, values and representations take place.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, project implementation becomes less of a planned programme, but more of a constant process of negotiation between social actors who have their own respective 'projects'. A similar view is offered by Crehan & Von Oppen (1988), who argue that development projects should not be seen only in terms of the goals and their achievement or non-achievement, but rather as a social event and an arena of struggle between different groups with diverse interests. While the role of the outsider (the development agent) may be in uential, it is not the only role.…”
Section: Development As a Processmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The notion of interface was intended to enrich or supplant the mechanical understanding of development as the introduction of a technological innovation with a more nuanced and politicized analytic. Development projects could no longer be seen as orderly, linear processes of technological adoption or adaptation, but were now cast in quasi-military metaphors, as 'arenas' (Crehan & von Oppen 1988) or 'battlefields' (Long & Long 1992).…”
Section: At the Development Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%