2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding water and ion transport behaviour and permeability through poly(amide) thin film composite membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
83
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
9
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The densities of the dry and hydrated membranes are close to previous experimental and simulation values [11,14,16,24,25]. Like other recent studies [21,22], the simulated membranes under study are much thinner than actual polymeric membranes used commercially, which are typically about 0.2 µm thick [26]. Nevertheless, the water flux through the simulated membrane is in the range expected for commercial membranes [23].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The densities of the dry and hydrated membranes are close to previous experimental and simulation values [11,14,16,24,25]. Like other recent studies [21,22], the simulated membranes under study are much thinner than actual polymeric membranes used commercially, which are typically about 0.2 µm thick [26]. Nevertheless, the water flux through the simulated membrane is in the range expected for commercial membranes [23].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In this approach the actual operating conditions of the RO process are simulated by applying a pressure difference across the membrane. Progress has been achieved in understanding some aspects of water and ion transport, though two recent studies seem to consider the case of equal ion concentrations on both sides of the membrane [21,22], a situation that would not occur in practice. By contrast, we study the situation in which solutes are initially concentrated on the high-pressure feed side of the membrane with pure water on the low-pressure permeate side of the membrane, both in our recent work in which we considered the physical aspects of the transport including the impact of the percolated free volume and size of the solute [23] and the current study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, CC2 appears to be the best POC membrane for water desalination. The P w in CC2 is higher than in several 2D membranes such as graphene, 27 graphyne 31 and CTF-1, 32 and one order of magnitude higher than in a polyamide membrane, 33 commercial seawater RO, brackish RO and high-flux RO membranes. 34 It is also higher than the P w in ZIFs from our recent simulation studies.…”
Section: Water Flow and Salt Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This behavior is attributed to the relatively free water permeation through the straight large pores in CC2 and the porous network in CC17. Comparatively, water molecules , 27 graphyne, 31 CTFs, 32 polyamide, 33 commercial RO 34 and ZIFs [35][36][37] ). stay in CC3 and CC16 for a much longer period (30-40 ns) because of their tetrahedral network and small radius, which are not favorable for water permeation.…”
Section: Water Dynamics and Structure In Pocsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 In particular, membranes removing small ions, such as nanofiltration (NF) membranes and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes, are widely used in seawater and brackish water desalination. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Conventional membranes contain films of cross-linked polyamides or cellulose acetates as separation functional layers. However, these films contain a disordered structure and the nanopores or sub-nanopores formed in those membranes for the transportation of water molecules and ions are not uniform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%