2014
DOI: 10.1108/nlw-05-2014-0052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding users: from man-made typologies to computer-generated clusters

Abstract: If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Luo (2017) suggested the use of photovoice for effective understanding of need, perception and behaviour of library users. Johannsen (2014) advocated the use of computer-based technology to classify user segments. Apart from providing information, libraries should ensure health and well-being of users which can be taken care by ergonomic furniture and improving environment quality through aesthetic appeal of library (S. Lee Young, 2014).…”
Section: Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luo (2017) suggested the use of photovoice for effective understanding of need, perception and behaviour of library users. Johannsen (2014) advocated the use of computer-based technology to classify user segments. Apart from providing information, libraries should ensure health and well-being of users which can be taken care by ergonomic furniture and improving environment quality through aesthetic appeal of library (S. Lee Young, 2014).…”
Section: Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%