2000
DOI: 10.1029/2000gl011747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding uncertainties in the response of ENSO to greenhouse warming

Abstract: Abstract.The response of ENSO to increases in greenhouse gases is found to be markedly different in climate change simulations using two different

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the two versions of the GFDL model (a factor 1.21±0.12 higher standard deviation in CM2.0 and 0.88±0.13 in CM2.1) shows that the change in variability is due to small details of the model, similar to that seen in Collins (2000a). Note that the changes are of the same order as those observed in the SOI over the periode 1866-2004, so that the predicted change in standard deviation is often only significant with more than one ensemble member, and hence unobservable in reality.…”
Section: Enso In a Warmer Climatesupporting
confidence: 48%
“…The difference between the two versions of the GFDL model (a factor 1.21±0.12 higher standard deviation in CM2.0 and 0.88±0.13 in CM2.1) shows that the change in variability is due to small details of the model, similar to that seen in Collins (2000a). Note that the changes are of the same order as those observed in the SOI over the periode 1866-2004, so that the predicted change in standard deviation is often only significant with more than one ensemble member, and hence unobservable in reality.…”
Section: Enso In a Warmer Climatesupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Although this is a statistically significant difference at the 95% level using an F test, it has been noted that the amplitude of ENSO varies considerably on long time scales in HadCM3. In a 1000-yr run of HadCM3 using modern-day forcing, centuries with ENSO amplitude as low as that in the 6-ka run can be found (Collins 2000). Therefore, it is possible that the reduced ENSO activity at 6 ka is not the result of the external forcing but the result of internal variability within the model.…”
Section: A Modern-day and Mid-holocene Mean States Simulated By Hadcm3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, flux adjustments in HadCM3 have been shown to improve both these inadequacies (Inness et al, 2003;Turner et al, 2005) so these are unlikely reasons in this case. Earlier work with different versions of the Unified Model (Collins, 2000a(Collins, , 2000b saw increased ENSO activity at biennial timescales at 4 × CO 2 in HadCM2, but not HadCM3. This different response was not attributable to the removal of global flux corrections between HadCM2 and HadCM3.…”
Section: Reasons For the Biennial Tendency In Hadcm3ipfamentioning
confidence: 99%