2016
DOI: 10.1038/nrm.2015.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding transport by the major facilitator superfamily (MFS): structures pave the way

Abstract: Members of the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) of transport proteins are essential for the movement of a wide range of substrates across biomembranes. As this transport requires a series of conformational changes, structures of MFS transporters captured in different conformational states are needed to decipher the transport mechanism. Recently, a large number of MFS transporter structures have been determined, which has provided us with an unprecedented opportunity to understand general aspects of the tran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
421
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 382 publications
(441 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
13
421
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…There are three groups of four alpha helices that interact to form the canonical MFS fold. Here, we use the nomenclature from Quistgaard et al , 2016 for the helices. A‐helices shown in blue (TM1, TM4, TM7, and TM10) are positioned at the center of the transporter and make up the transport path needed for substrate binding and exchange or cotransport coupling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are three groups of four alpha helices that interact to form the canonical MFS fold. Here, we use the nomenclature from Quistgaard et al , 2016 for the helices. A‐helices shown in blue (TM1, TM4, TM7, and TM10) are positioned at the center of the transporter and make up the transport path needed for substrate binding and exchange or cotransport coupling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to TetB, there are many other MFS transporters, which contribute to single and multidrug resistance in a wide variety of pathogens and their thorough characterization is of great interest (Fluman & Bibi, 2009; Alegre et al , 2016). Despite the low percentage of protein sequence similarity among MFS transporters, their overall structure is largely conserved with a general understanding of how specific regions of the transporter contribute to substrate binding and/or pumping efficiency (Yan, 2015; Quistgaard et al , 2016). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such problems include the fact that it can be difficult to solubilize membrane-associated proteins for crystallization, and that X-ray crystallography relies on the arrangement of protein into a regular assembly. This often means that only single conformations can be sampled, leaving much of the dynamic cycle of these proteins unobserved and continually debated [1]. Additionally, membrane transporters may consist of large proteins, or can exist as multidomain complexes making them difficult to measure for size-limited methods such as NMR spectroscopy (though recent advances in solid state NMR are starting to minimize this limitation) [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MFS membrane transport proteins are conserved within both prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms and have high structural similarity and yet divergent functions and substrate specificities (48). MFS transporters typically move one substrate by coupling transport, with a second substrate diffusing its concentration gradient, such as a proton.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%