Understanding the water balance paradox in the Athabasca River Basin, Canada

Abstract

This study demonstrates the importance of the including and appropriately parameterizing peatlands and forestlands for basin‐scale integrated surface–subsurface models in the northern boreal forest, with particular emphasis on the Athabasca River Basin (ARB). With a long‐term water balance approach to the ARB, we investigate reasons why downstream mean annual stream flow rates are consistently higher than upstream, despite the subhumid water deficit conditions in the downstream regimes. A high‐resolution 3D variably saturated subsurface and surface water flow and evapotranspiration model of the ARB is constructed based on the bedrock and surficial geology and the spatial distribution of peatlands and their corresponding eco‐regions. Historical climate data were used to drive the model for calibration against 40‐year long‐term average surface flow and groundwater observations during the historic instrumental period. The simulation results demonstrate that at the basin‐scale, peatlands and forestlands can have a strong influence on the surface–subsurface hydrologic systems. In particular, peatlands in the midstream and downstream regimes of the ARB increase the water availability to the surface–subsurface water systems by reducing water loss through evapotranspiration. Based on the comparison of forestland evapotranspiration between observation and simulation, the overall spatial average evapotranspiration in downstream forestlands is larger than that in peatlands and thus the water contribution to the stream flow in downstream areas is relatively minor. Therefore, appropriate representation of peatlands and forestlands within the basin‐scale hydrologic model is critical to reproduce the water balance of the ARB.

Natural Stimuli Calibration with Fining Direction Regularization in an Integrated Hydrologic Model

“…HGS has been successfully applied to a many real‐world studies ranging from basin scale applications (Hwang et al , ); to hillslope studies (Park et al ); to river cross‐section surface water‐groundwater interaction studies (Doble et al ; Liggett et al ; Batlle‐Aguilar et al ; Schilling et al ).…”

“…It uses a globally-implicit approach to simultaneously solve the 2-D diffusion-wave equation in the surface domain, and 3-D form of Richards' equation in the subsurface domain. The reader is referred to Brunner and Simmons (2012) and Aquanty (2018) HGS has been successfully applied to a many realworld studies ranging from basin scale applications (Hwang et al 2015(Hwang et al , 2018; to hillslope studies (Park et al 2011); to river cross-section surface water-groundwater interaction studies (Doble et al 2012b;Liggett et al 2014;Batlle-Aguilar et al 2015;Schilling et al 2017).…”

High-Resolution, Integrated Hydrological Modeling of Climate Change Impacts on a Semi-Arid Urban Watershed in Niamey, Niger

“…Such a representation allows the reduction of biases in evapotranspiration biases using a mechanistic evapotranspiration model, as is done in climate models. Thus, the evapotranspiration model can be simplified based on the purpose of the study [44,45].…”

Untangling global change impacts on hydrological processes: Resisting climatization

“…Thus, appropriately accounting for these interactions is central to properly understanding global change impacts. Noting the importance of accounting for impacts of groundwater pumping when predicting climate change effects, physically based coupled surface–subsurface hydrologic modelling has advanced rapidly from conceptual proof of concept (Davison, Hwang, Sudicky, & Lin, ; Jones, Sudicky, Brookfield, & Park, ; Maxwell et al, ; Sudicky, Jones, Park, Brookfield, & Colautti, ) to basin‐scale simulations (Davison, Hwang, Sudicky, Mallia, & Lin, ; Erler et al, ; Ferguson & Maxwell, ; Hwang et al, ; Maxwell & Condon, ). Variable local weather systems alter hydrological processes, and human water use exaggerates this feedback.…”