2018
DOI: 10.1002/jcop.21965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the three levels of resilience: Implications for countering extremism

Abstract: The huge growth in expenditure on counter‐extremism and counter‐terrorism policy post 9/11 (Dawson & Guinnessy, 2002; Lum, Kennedy, & Sherley, 2006; Silke, 2004) has seen buzzwords such as “resilience” integrated without clear framing or the underpinning of empirical evidence. The issue addressed by the current study is twofold: the framing of resilience within policy is not such that it clearly relates to extremism and, the subsequent lack of understanding that exists on the relationships between the 3 levels… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resilience operates at different levels, including the micro, meso and macro. However, Ryan et al (2018) note "there is no empirical evidence to suggest that individual resilience alone predicts community resilience and in turn national resilience". Community resilience, then, cannot simply refer to a collection of resilient individuals, but instead encompasses a more complex set of relations cross-cutting these different levels.…”
Section: Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resilience operates at different levels, including the micro, meso and macro. However, Ryan et al (2018) note "there is no empirical evidence to suggest that individual resilience alone predicts community resilience and in turn national resilience". Community resilience, then, cannot simply refer to a collection of resilient individuals, but instead encompasses a more complex set of relations cross-cutting these different levels.…”
Section: Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only recently has research begun to examine the associations between different levels of resilience. 79,80,81 This research conclude that the different levels of resilience are all positively correlated with each other, but that their low common variance also emphasized their distinctiveness. As such, there is reason to question whether all these attributes and scales of terrorism resilience belong together in the same scientific concepts, especially if the aim of the research is to measure resilience or to describe how to become resilient.…”
Section: Coherencementioning
confidence: 62%
“…The links and the associations between the levels of resilience is not supported by empirical evidence. 82,83 Despite of the plurality and inconsistency of the resilience concept in the academic literature, the idea of resilience makes sense because counterterrorism nowadays has become a multiscale responsibility. Consequently, on an overall level, all these different interpretations of terrorism resilience are meaningful because together they constitute a coherent idea of a resilient society.…”
Section: Coherencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutions are considered in more detail in the recent literature promoting community resilience as a means of discouraging radicalization in newcomer communities (Ellis & Abdi, 2017 ; Ryan et al, 2018 ). In this literature, resilience is often conceptualized concretely as a group’s success in counteracting community-based violence and radical recruitment.…”
Section: The Concept Of Social Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%