1996
DOI: 10.2307/2555932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Supply Decisions of Nonprofits: Modelling the Location of Private Schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
62
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Starting from the full sample, we randomly group villages into "fake" PCs with 4 villages in each PC (the median number of villages per PC in our sample) and classify villages as eligible using the new PC classifications. 23 We then apply the sample restrictions discussed in Section IIb and estimate the reduced form relationship, cov(P rivate it , GSS it |P op 1981 ). These steps were then repeated 5000 times to generate a distribution of estimated coefficients under random assignment of villages to PCs.…”
Section: The Assignment Of Villages To Pcs Matters: a Placebo Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Starting from the full sample, we randomly group villages into "fake" PCs with 4 villages in each PC (the median number of villages per PC in our sample) and classify villages as eligible using the new PC classifications. 23 We then apply the sample restrictions discussed in Section IIb and estimate the reduced form relationship, cov(P rivate it , GSS it |P op 1981 ). These steps were then repeated 5000 times to generate a distribution of estimated coefficients under random assignment of villages to PCs.…”
Section: The Assignment Of Villages To Pcs Matters: a Placebo Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Augmenting the instrument set with potential candidates that are correlated to the probability of having a private school but uncorrelated to the wage-bill can help in identification and the efficiency of the estimator. Following Downes and Greenstein (1996), we propose using the number of public boy's primary schools as an additional instrument in the selection equation. In the presence of competitive schooling effects, private schools should be less likely to setup in villages where there are public boy's primary schools; additionally, such schools are unlikely to affect the wage-bill of the entrepreneur directly since public school teachers are rarely if ever hired locally and their wages are fixed and centrally determined.…”
Section: Price Marginmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do this, we aggregated organization-level data to the state geography by summing values of relevant financial information based upon the address reported by nonprofit charities on IRS Form 990 and FIPS codes that indicate the state domicile of each organization. Existing research shows the nonprofit charity sector is overwhelmingly community-based and locally oriented, such that both charitable financing and spending for service provision primarily occur within state borders (Bielefeld & Murdoch, 2004;Bielefeld, Murdoch, & Waddell, 1997;Calabrese, 2011;Downs & Greenstein, 1996;DeVita, Manjarraz, & Twombly, 1999). 4 The $25,000 minimum requirement was the rule during the time period of our data; the current minimum gross revenue for required IRS Form 990 filing is $50,000.…”
Section: Model Specification and Datamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, Nechyba (2003) argues that there are two additional effects that may counter this incentive -first, such equalization of spending may improve public school quality in previously low-spending districts, and second, private school attendees who previously chose to live in poor districts under local public school financing in order to take advantage of depressed housing values and lower property tax payments lose both these incentives under a move to centralized public school financing. The empirical evidence on this is mixed - Downes and Greenstein (1996) find that California experienced a sizeable growth in the number of private schools after its school finance reform while Sonstelie et al (2000) argue that the move from local to state finance had little impact on private school enrollments in California. Since in Michigan districts most affected by Proposal A were generally not the same ones most affected by charter penetration, it is unlikely that the above mechanisms played any significant role here.…”
Section: Are the Estimates Biased By The Effects Of School Finance Rementioning
confidence: 99%