2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the structure–property relationship in cortical bone to design a biomimetic composite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(108 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having tested the crack propagation in homogeneous specimens, we now consider the fracture of heterogeneous materials composed of two constituent materials with very high mismatch in the elastic moduli, such as those occurring in biomaterials or engineering composites reinforced with high strength and high modulus fibers. We first consider a specimen designed to mimic the microstructure of cortical bone, following previous studies [27,28]. It is known that a high modulus mismatch in cortical bone structure causes crack deflection [27,28], which increases the toughness modulus of the material.…”
Section: Tensile Test Of a Bone-inspired Compositementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Having tested the crack propagation in homogeneous specimens, we now consider the fracture of heterogeneous materials composed of two constituent materials with very high mismatch in the elastic moduli, such as those occurring in biomaterials or engineering composites reinforced with high strength and high modulus fibers. We first consider a specimen designed to mimic the microstructure of cortical bone, following previous studies [27,28]. It is known that a high modulus mismatch in cortical bone structure causes crack deflection [27,28], which increases the toughness modulus of the material.…”
Section: Tensile Test Of a Bone-inspired Compositementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first consider a specimen designed to mimic the microstructure of cortical bone, following previous studies [27,28]. It is known that a high modulus mismatch in cortical bone structure causes crack deflection [27,28], which increases the toughness modulus of the material. For the design of composites inspired by such structures and for the optimization of their toughness, it is crucial to predict the entire force-displacement curve accurately.…”
Section: Tensile Test Of a Bone-inspired Compositementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cortical bone, which bears the major weight of the body, is considered the highest load-bearing tissue in the lower limb [44]. Despite the high strength, light weight, and extreme toughness of the cortical bone, it has the highest fracture risk [45]. In most cases, aging, accident, or diseases are the main causes of the bone failure.…”
Section: Natural Bones: Structure and Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, aging, accident, or diseases are the main causes of the bone failure. Although there are several attempts to study the mechanical behaviors as well as the macro-, micro-, and nanobone structures [44][45][46], reports revealed that the rate of bone fracture is rising every year. Thus, there is still need for thorough investigation on the biomaterials, implants design, and manufacturing.…”
Section: Natural Bones: Structure and Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40] Indeed, animals subjected to stresses that come from gravity force, such as human, bovine, and equine species show a characteristic osteonal structure, whereas fish species are characterized by a more lamellar one. [41] It has been shown that energy dissipation arising from the bone heterogeneity lead to markedly different biomechanical properties compared with a uniform material.…”
Section: Inspiration and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%