Understanding the spatiotemporal pattern of grazing cattle movement

Abstract

Understanding the drivers of animal movement is significant for ecology and biology. Yet researchers have so far been unable to fully understand these drivers, largely due to low data resolution. In this study, we analyse a high-frequency movement dataset for a group of grazing cattle and investigate their spatiotemporal patterns using a simple two-state ‘stop-and-move’ mobility model. We find that the dispersal kernel in the moving state is best described by a mixture exponential distribution, indicating the hierarchical nature of the movement. On the other hand, the waiting time appears to be scale-invariant below a certain cut-off and is best described by a truncated power-law distribution, suggesting that the non-moving state is governed by time-varying dynamics. We explore possible explanations for the observed phenomena, covering factors that can play a role in the generation of mobility patterns, such as the context of grazing environment, the intrinsic decision-making mechanism or the energy status of different activities. In particular, we propose a new hypothesis that the underlying movement pattern can be attributed to the most probable observable energy status under the maximum entropy configuration. These results are not only valuable for modelling cattle movement but also provide new insights for understanding the underlying biological basis of grazing behaviour.

Assessment of a livestock GPS collar based on an open‐source datalogger informs best practices for logging intensity

“…The dataloggers functioned well in the field trial, and integrating the TPL5110 low power timer can potentially extend battery life by a factor of seven, which means up to 50 days of burst logging with a 6,600 mAh battery. Our 20‐s logging interval certainly qualifies as high‐frequency for the purposes of comparing error created by less‐frequent intervals: While some studies logged at 10‐s intervals and calculated error from there (Liu, Green, Rodríguez, Ramirez, & Shike, ; Swain, Wark, & Bishop‐Hurley, ; Zhao & Jurdak, ), other studies used baseline data from intervals as long as 4–5 min (Johnson & Ganskopp, ; Mills et al., ) and 15 min (Akasbi et al., ).…”

“…But while the frontiers of GPS‐based animal tracking are exciting, there remains a core set of research questions that rely on GPS methods. For example, ecologists worldwide use GPS to study the spatial patterns of domestic livestock and managed herbivores to measure animal movement and behavioral responses to heterogeneous environments (Allred et al., ; Girard, Bork, Nielsen, & Alexander, ; Raynor et al., ; Zhao & Jurdak, ). Data from animal‐borne GPS receivers can also enhance agroecosystem sustainability by giving managers information useful to increase productivity and identify areas of use sensitive to environmental degradation (Haan, Russell, Davis, & Morrical, ; Turner, Udal, Larson, & Shearer, ).…”

Deep Learning for Exploration and Recovery of Uncharted and Dynamic Targets from UAV-like Vision

“…if d i = r, A ext = {f, b, n}). This motion behaviour approximation is supported by literature observing collective dynamics for grazing cattle herds [42]. Finally, upon reaching the boundaries of E, a new group direction d i+1 is randomly selected where…”

An Improved Energy-Efficient Prediction-based Model for Animal Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks

“…waiting and moving with probability x 1 and x 2 = 1 − x 1 at a regular basis, where x 1 and x 2 are the priority of the activity drawn from a random distribution p(x). If the animal moves, it changes its context and therefore its likelihood to move or stay also changes [24].…”