Understanding the Social Edition Through Iterative Implementation: The Case of the Devonshire MS (BL Add MS 17492)

Crompton, Constance; Arbuckle, Alyssa; Siemens, Ray

doi:10.22230/src.2013v4n3a118

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The 'Open Social Scholarship Annotated Bibliography' was compiled in 2015-2016 by a collaborative team at the Electronic Textual Cultures Lab (ETCL). 1 This document was inspired by two previous annotated bibliographies authored by ETCL members in collaboration with the INKE Research Group: the initial 'Social Knowledge Creation: Three Annotated Bibliographies' (Arbuckle et al 2013) and an updated version, 'An Annotated Bibliography of Social Knowledge Creation' (Arbuckle et al 2017). The 2013 publication provided a snapshot of contemporary scholarship, initiatives, and research technologies related to social knowledge creation.…”

Section: Intent and History Of The Bibliographymentioning

confidence: 99%

Open Social Scholarship Annotated Bibliography

Khatib

Seatter

Hajj

et al. 2019

KULA

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This annotated bibliography responds to and contextualizes the growing 'Open' movements and recent institutional reorientation towards social, public-facing scholarship. The aim of this document is to present a working definition of open social scholarship through the aggregation and summation of critical resources in the field. Our work surveys foundational publications, innovative research projects, and global organizations that enact the theories and practices of open social scholarship. The bibliography builds on the knowledge creation principles outlined in previous research by broadening the focus beyond conventional academic spaces and reinvigorating central, defining themes with recently published research.

show abstract

Section: Intent and History Of The Bibliographymentioning

confidence: 99%

Open Social Scholarship Annotated Bibliography

Khatib

Seatter

Hajj

et al. 2019

KULA

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…e Electronic Textual Cultures Lab (ETCL) and INKE team have explored the study and practice of social knowledge creation through its public development of A Social Edition of the Devonshire Manuscript on Wikibooks (Crompton, Arbuckle, & Siemens, 2013). By prototyping an edition of an early modern text on the principles of open access and editorial transparency, the case study demonstrates that new media environments can effectively facilitate access to, contribution to, and discussion of scholarly knowledge for stakeholders both inside and outside the academy, without jettisoning the peer review process.…”

Section: Principlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Knowledge Creation: Three Annotated Bibliographies

Arbuckle

Belojevic

Hiebert

et al. 2014

SRC

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2012-2013 a team led by Ray Siemens at the Electronic Textual Cultures Lab (ETCL), University of Victoria, in collaboration with Implementing New Knowledge Environments (INKE), developed three annotated bibliographies under the rubric of social knowledge creation. The items for the bibliographies were gathered and annotated by members of the Electronic Textual Cultures Lab (ETCL) to form this tripartite document as a resource for students and researchers involved in the iNKE team and well beyond, iincluding at digital humanities seminars in Bern (June 2013) and Leipzig (July 2013).

show abstract

“…The Social Media Engine is a tool that extracts topics from research articles of a given corpus and matches them to ongoing social media discussions (Meneses, Arbuckle, Lopez et al 2019). Rounding out this sample of a much larger list of innovative projects, A Social Edition of the Devonshire Manuscript is an open access, editable Wikibooks edition of a 16th-century verse miscellany (Crompton et al 2013;Siemens et al 2012). Christian Vandendorpe (2012) has also written on the value of academics working on Wikipedia to broaden public engagement, and many others have discussed the open social scholarship potential of academic publishing.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

An Open Social Scholarship Path for the Humanities

Arbuckle

Siemens

Bath

et al. 2022

The Journal of Electronic Publishing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Open digital scholarship is significant for facilitating public access to and engagement with research, and as a foundation for growing digital scholarly infrastructure around the world today and in the future. But the path to adopting open, digital scholarship on a national—never mind international—scale is challenged by several real, pragmatic issues. In this article we consider these issues as well as proactive strategies for the realization of robust, inclusive, publicly engaged, open scholarship in digital form. We draw on the INKE Partnership’s central goal of fostering open social scholarship (academic practice that enables the creation, dissemination, and engagement of open research by specialists and non-specialists in accessible and significant ways). In doing so, we look to pursue more open, and more social, scholarly activities through knowledge mobilization, community training, public engagement, and policy recommendations in order to understand and address challenges facing digital scholarly communication. We then provide tangible details, outlining how the INKE Partnership puts open social scholarship theory into practice, with an eye to a more open and engaged future.

show abstract

Understanding the Social Edition Through Iterative Implementation: The Case of the Devonshire MS (BL Add MS 17492)

Cited by 4 publications

References 2 publications

Open Social Scholarship Annotated Bibliography

Open Social Scholarship Annotated Bibliography

Social Knowledge Creation: Three Annotated Bibliographies

An Open Social Scholarship Path for the Humanities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About