2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00340-012-5178-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the sensitivity of cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy: pathlength enhancement versus noise suppression

Abstract: Cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy is now widely used as an ultrasensitive technique in observing weak spectroscopic absorptions. Photons inside the cavity are reflected back and forth between the mirrors with reflectivities R close to one and thus (on average) exploit an absorption pathlength L that is 1/(1 -R) longer than a single pass measurement. As suggested by the Beer-Lambert law, this increase in L results in enhanced absorbance A (given by aL with a being the absorption coefficient) which in turn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the homogenous solutions, cells have heterogeneous structures that cause light scattering and refraction. Eq ( 1 ) is valid for homogeneous, low-scattering samples [ 9 ]. Therefore, we simply calculated the inverse of the transparency, I blank / I sample , where I blank represents the blank signals obtained by the empty region of interest, and I sample represents the sample signals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the homogenous solutions, cells have heterogeneous structures that cause light scattering and refraction. Eq ( 1 ) is valid for homogeneous, low-scattering samples [ 9 ]. Therefore, we simply calculated the inverse of the transparency, I blank / I sample , where I blank represents the blank signals obtained by the empty region of interest, and I sample represents the sample signals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This off-axis ICOS approach has yielded an NEA sensitivity of 3.1 × 10 − 11 cm − 1 Hz − 1/2 , two orders of magnitude fi ner than that for conventional CEAS/ICOS. Ouyang and Jones (2012) have explained that the high sensitivity of CEAS/ICOS relies on a trade-off between pathlength enhancement and noise suppression, such that the quotient [ Δ I / I ] in Equation [6.2] is much increased because the denominator I is much smaller than in conventional single-pass absorption spectroscopy, with a correspondingly smaller contribution to the noise level.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported 3σ detection precisions were 0.03 ppbv (60 s) with an L eff of 13 km and 0.045 ppbv (5 s) with an L eff of 17.8 km, respectively. The achievable sensitivity of BBCES depends on the number of photons injected into the cavity (which depends on the source brightness and beam imaging efficiency), L eff (which depends on the cavity mirror quality and mirror separation), and how efficiently the various noise components are suppressed [27,51]. In this work, the light injection efficiency was improved with the cage-based configuration.…”
Section: Precision Accuracy and Detection Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%