Understanding the Role of Institutions in Industrial Relations: Perspectives from Classical Sociological Theory

Abstract

Theories of industrial relations have called for a stronger integration of the economic and social. Whereas economists have studied economic functions of institutions, neo‐institutional approaches in sociology have strongly rejected economic explanation in favor of seeing institutions as taken‐for‐granted cognitive assumptions. To further dialogue among these perspectives, this study reconstructs the concept of institutions in the classical sociological theory of Durkheim and Weber. Both classical perspectives place the dynamic tensions between the economic and social at the center of their theories, but develop these in distinct ways. The study illustrates the potential and limits of these four theoretical perspectives on institutions with regard to the empirical case of codetermination in Germany.

Institutionalized Involvement: Teams and Stress in 1990s U.S. Steel

“…Indeed, the popularity of EI exploded during the 1980s and 1990s (Osterman ) as firms emulated the Japanese success story and the business press sang of EI's virtues, instilling in managers a “participative philosophy” that extolled workers’ intrinsic productive knowledge (Alvesson ). As a pattern of concrete practices socially constructed as rational, natural, and inherently valuable (Berger and Luckmann ; Jackson and Muellenborn ), EI was thoroughly institutionalized by the mid‐late 1990s.…”

Varieties of Capitalism and institutional comparative advantage: A test and reinterpretation

“…Importantly, this view of institutions goes beyond the notion of property rights or embeddedness in social networks that facilitate market exchange. Rather, institutions act as constraints on markets, on the one hand, but serve to stabilize them, on the other -thus suggesting their Durkheimian character (Jackson & Muellenborn, 2012).…”

Industrial relations changes in the Maldives: critical events and actors

“…The establishment of the MDP is an example of ‘purposeful and continual actions of individuals and collective actors’, a condition crucial for institutional change (Reay et al ., :993). A sociological model of how actors pursue their goals suggests they ‘pursue legitimacy or taken‐for‐granted cognitive scripts’ (Jackson and Muellenborn, :475). The government's ‘road‐map to reform’ comprised eight key elements including ‘promoting and strengthening human rights’, ‘enhancing the independence of the judiciary’, ‘a more independent media’ and ‘modernization of the electoral system’.…”

“…But later on, a local chef was employed and we were given gym facilities. (RW10) Seeking legitimacy in the eyes of potential foreign investors (Jackson and Muellenborn, 2012), the government responded quickly and severely to put down the strikes. The introduction of Employment Dispute Resolution Regulation (2011) further limited the constitutional right to strike by imposing numerous conditions on its legality.…”

“…Institutional analysis in IR has traditionally focused on formal regulatory institutions such as unions, laws and regulations (Jackson and Muellenborn, ). However, according to Wood and Lane () and Morgan and Hauptmeier (), the institutional literature now recognizes that institutions are not as clearly coupled as often depicted, and that with national contexts, it is likely that not one but several dominant work and employment relations paradigms are likely to be encountered.…”