2015
DOI: 10.1061/jswbay.0000794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Role of Evapotranspiration in Bioretention: Mesocosm Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, 50‐year climate simulations using DRAINMOD also largely underestimate the evaporative fraction of long‐term water budgets (Wardynski, Hunt, & Brown, ; Figure , orange box, lower left). This pattern is corroborated by Hess, Wadzuk, and Welker () and Wadzuk et al (), who reported that using Penman–Monteith tends to underestimate ET while using Hargreaves tends to overestimate ET. The yellow circles in Figure represent two cells where ET was estimated using Penman–Monteith.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, 50‐year climate simulations using DRAINMOD also largely underestimate the evaporative fraction of long‐term water budgets (Wardynski, Hunt, & Brown, ; Figure , orange box, lower left). This pattern is corroborated by Hess, Wadzuk, and Welker () and Wadzuk et al (), who reported that using Penman–Monteith tends to underestimate ET while using Hargreaves tends to overestimate ET. The yellow circles in Figure represent two cells where ET was estimated using Penman–Monteith.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Therefore, internal water storage zones may also maintain system capacity for ET by limiting plant water stress and maintaining sufficient capillary conductance and connectivity to the soil surface. Wadzuk et al () demonstrate ET limitation by water availability using weighing lysimeters with and without an internal water storage zone. Lysimetry data from Hess () clearly implicate ET as an important loss pathway for bioretention (Figure , in green).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When considering the difference in water availability between the two sites, these results are consistent with previous research where sap flow sensors were employed to characterize tree transpiration, along with other studies of ET in bioretention practices. Relating these observations to bioretention, results from Wadzuk et al (2015) indicated higher portions of the water balance of bioretention practices with IWS layers that maintained soil moisture could be attributed to ET. Berland et al (2017) suggest that sustaining high ET rates in green infrastructure practices requires adequate soil moisture levels to be maintained.…”
Section: Sap Flowmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Li, Sharkey, Hunt, and Davis (2009) used a field-based water balance approach in a bioretention practice planted with unidentified trees and shrubs and lined with an impermeable membrane (to eliminate exfiltration) and found that losses due to ET accounted for 19% of run-off volume reduction. In a more controlled approach, Wadzuk, Hickman, and Traver (2015) used weighing lysimeters to compare ET in bioretention mesocosms planted with native grasses and found that 50% of direct rainfall was converted to ET in freely draining systems, whereas mesocosms with an internal water storage (IWS) layer converted 78% of direct rainfall to ET, though the authors indicate these figures represent a high estimate. In a more controlled approach, Wadzuk, Hickman, and Traver (2015) used weighing lysimeters to compare ET in bioretention mesocosms planted with native grasses and found that 50% of direct rainfall was converted to ET in freely draining systems, whereas mesocosms with an internal water storage (IWS) layer converted 78% of direct rainfall to ET, though the authors indicate these figures represent a high estimate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%