2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-38525-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the role of distance, direction and cue salience in an associative model of landmark learning

Abstract: Navigation and spatial memory relies on the ability to use and recall environmental landmarks relative to important locations. Such learning is thought to result from the strengthening of associations between the goal location and environmental cues. Factors that contribute to the strength of this association include cue stability, saliency and cue location. Here we combine an autoregressive random walk model, that describes goal-directed swimming behaviour, with an associative learning model to provide an int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In straight-line distance judgments, however, distance to a target was not correlated with decision latency (i.e., no indication of mental tracing; Burte & Hegarty, 2012), nor was accuracy significantly correlated with self-report sense of direction (Burte & Montello, 2017). In a similar vein, the independence of processing direction and distance information is shown in a simulation of goal-directed behavior (Commins & Fey, 2019). It has also been documented in mathematics learning that students understand direction and distance differently; they have difficulty with the concept of angle, compared with length (Clements & Sarama, 2009, pp.…”
Section: Distance and Direction Knowledgementioning
confidence: 97%
“…In straight-line distance judgments, however, distance to a target was not correlated with decision latency (i.e., no indication of mental tracing; Burte & Hegarty, 2012), nor was accuracy significantly correlated with self-report sense of direction (Burte & Montello, 2017). In a similar vein, the independence of processing direction and distance information is shown in a simulation of goal-directed behavior (Commins & Fey, 2019). It has also been documented in mathematics learning that students understand direction and distance differently; they have difficulty with the concept of angle, compared with length (Clements & Sarama, 2009, pp.…”
Section: Distance and Direction Knowledgementioning
confidence: 97%
“…It has been shown that the saliency of the cues set around the testing room modulates the precision of the searching patterns in MWM task ( Commins and Fey, 2019 ). Some features of the cues like shape, size, brightness, and distance from the pool or from the platform can contribute to its saliency.…”
Section: The Morris Water Mazementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of cues or landmarks is essential for successful navigation in both the real world and virtual environments (Jansen-Osmann & Fuchs, 2006;Morris, 1981;Rodrigo, 2002). However, there is evidence that cue salience (in terms of size, brightness, and proximity to the goal) may only impact spatial performance (Commins & Fey, 2019). For example, Chamizo and Rodrigo (2004) examined the importance of relative distance of a landmark to a goal using the water maze task.…”
Section: Brief Introduction and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%