DOI: 10.14264/uql.2020.824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the role of direct and indirect interactions in mediating local plant diversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting dataset includes between 29 to over 1000 counts of individual plant seed production from 22 different focal species (with a median of 108 observations per species), in addition to the identity and densities of all neighbouring individuals within the interaction neighbourhood of each focal plant. Interaction neighbourhoods varied in radius from 3 to 5 cm depending on the size of the focal species (Martyn 2020). Total neighbourhood diversity was 71 wildflower species, 19 of which were recorded fewer than 10 times across the whole dataset.…”
Section: Supplementary Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting dataset includes between 29 to over 1000 counts of individual plant seed production from 22 different focal species (with a median of 108 observations per species), in addition to the identity and densities of all neighbouring individuals within the interaction neighbourhood of each focal plant. Interaction neighbourhoods varied in radius from 3 to 5 cm depending on the size of the focal species (Martyn 2020). Total neighbourhood diversity was 71 wildflower species, 19 of which were recorded fewer than 10 times across the whole dataset.…”
Section: Supplementary Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first assumes that many species have similar effects on one another and can be grouped a priori according to biological factors (e.g. traits, life form; Martyn, 2020; Uriarte et al, 2004). The second assumes that a majority of interactions are weak and hence can be removed from the model through variable selection procedures (Mutshinda et al, 2009; Weiss‐Lehman et al, 2022), resulting in a sparse interaction network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess species' responses to the environment in the presence and absence of neighbours, we randomly assigned three subplots per species per plot to a neighbour removal treatment and left the remaining three subplots with naturally occurring assemblages. For the thinned subplots, we removed all neighbouring plants rooting within a 7.5 cm radius of the focal individual as per protocol described in Mayfield and Stouffer (2017), appropriate for capturing most direct plant–plant interactions in this system (Martyn, 2020). We recorded the abundance and identity of all neighbouring plants within the interaction neighbourhood during peak flowering in September.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%