2016
DOI: 10.4236/jmp.2016.79083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Relativistic Generalization of Density Functional Theory (DFT) and Completing It in Practice

Abstract: In 2014, 50 years following the introduction of density functional theory (DFT), a rigorous understanding of it was published [AIP Advances, 4, 127,104 (2014)]. This understanding includes two features that complete the theory in practice, inasmuch as they are necessary for its correct application in electronic structure calculations; this understanding elucidates what appears to have been the crucial misunderstanding for 50 years, namely, the confusion between a stationary solution, attainable with most basis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Those values, along with occupied energies, are the only ones that belong to the spectrum of the Hamiltonian [25]. Both the Rayleigh theorem [25,43] for eigenvalues and the second corollary of the first DFT theorem [25,31,33,43,44] explain the spurious nature of unoccupied energies lowered from their values obtained with the optimal basis set. The noted unphysically lowering of unoccupied energies, including some of the lowest laying ones, while the occupied energies do not change, is a plausible explanation of the quasi-universal underestimation of band gaps in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Those values, along with occupied energies, are the only ones that belong to the spectrum of the Hamiltonian [25]. Both the Rayleigh theorem [25,43] for eigenvalues and the second corollary of the first DFT theorem [25,31,33,43,44] explain the spurious nature of unoccupied energies lowered from their values obtained with the optimal basis set. The noted unphysically lowering of unoccupied energies, including some of the lowest laying ones, while the occupied energies do not change, is a plausible explanation of the quasi-universal underestimation of band gaps in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We employed the Ceperley and Alder’s [ 20 ] local density approximation potential, which was parameterized by Vosko et al [ 21 ]. Based on DFT, it fully minimized the energy functional with the Bagayoko, Zhao, and Williams (BZW) method [ 22 , 23 , 24 ], as enhanced by Ekuma and Franklin (BZW-EF) [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ], while implementing the linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO). We employed a program package developed at the Ames Laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Ames, Iowa [ 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Computational Methods and Related Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first of the above referenced three (3) consecutive calculations, with the smallest basis set, provides the true DFT description of the material. The occupied energies of these calculations are unaffected (i.e., they do not change), however, the unoccupied energies from these calculations are either lower than or equal to their corresponding values produced with the optimal basis set [ 25 , 27 , 31 ]. In the discussion section, we address this extra-lowering of some unoccupied energies while the occupied ones remain unchanged.…”
Section: Computational Methods and Related Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We succinctly provide below the essential features of our computational approach. Extensive details on it are available in the literature [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. As with most other calculations, we employed a density functional theory (DFT) potential and the linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO).…”
Section: Methods and Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With just two (2) consecutive calculations leading to the same occupied energies, these energies could represent a local minima and not the absolute ones. The first of the referenced three (3) consecutive calculations [34] is the one providing the DFT description of the material. The basis set for this calculation is dubbed the optimal basis set, i.e., the smallest basis set leading to the ground state charge density and energies.…”
Section: Methods and Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%