Understanding the relationship between the perceived characteristics of clinical practice guidelines and their uptake: protocol for a realist review

Abstract

BackgroundClinical practice guidelines have the potential to facilitate the implementation of evidence into practice, support clinical decision making, specify beneficial therapeutic approaches, and influence public policy. However, these potential benefits have not been consistently achieved. The limited impact of guidelines can be attributed to organisational constraints, the complexity of the guidelines, and the lack of usability testing or end-user involvement in their development. Implementability has been referred to as the perceived characteristics of guidelines that predict the relative ease of their implementation at the clinical level, but this concept is as yet poorly defined. The objective of our study is to identify guideline attributes that affect uptake in practice by considering evidence from four disciplines (medicine, psychology, management, human factors engineering) to determine the relationship between the perceived characteristics of recommendations and their uptake and to develop a framework of implementability.MethodsA realist-review approach to knowledge synthesis will be used to understand attributes of guidelines (e.g., its text and content) and how changing these elements might impact clinical practice and clinical decision making. It also allows for the exploration of 'what works for whom, in what circumstances, and in what respects'. The realist review will be structured according to Pawson's five practical steps in realist reviews: (1) clarifying the scope of the review, (2) determining the search strategy, (3) ensuring proper article selection and study quality assessment, (4) extracting and organising data, and (5) synthesising the evidence and drawing conclusions. Data will be synthesised according to a two-stage analysis: (1) we will extract and define all relevant guideline attributes from the different disciplines, then create a shortlist of unique attributes and investigate their relationships with uptake, and (2) we will compare and contrast the attributes and guideline uptake within each and between the four disciplines to create a robust framework of implementability.DiscussionCreating guidelines that are designed to maximise uptake may be a potentially effective and inexpensive way of increasing their impact. However, this is best achieved by a comprehensive framework to inform the design of guidelines drawing on a range of disciplines that study behaviour change. This study will use a customised realist-review approach to synthesising the literature to better understand and operationalise a complex and under-theorised concept.

Guideline uptake is influenced by six implementability domains for creating and communicating guidelines: a realist review

“…We achieved rigor in our review through transparent documentation of the methodological approach [15] as well as for our search strategy, study selection, analysis, and interpretation, including any deviations from the original method. We also provided a detailed flow diagram for our study methods (Fig.…”

“…Our protocol is published elsewhere [15]. We report our methods and findings according to the RAMESES (Realist And Metanarrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards) criteria for the publication standards of realist reviews [16] and include a flow diagram of our methods for increased clarity (Fig.…”

Aminoglycoside-induced hearing deficits – a review of cochlear ototoxicity

“…41 Although clinical guidelines can promote the use of evidence to shape practice at a clinical level, adoption of such guidelines can be inconsistent for reasons which include conflicting opinion and the complexity of the documents. 42 With particular reference to ototoxicity, there has been a call for ototoxicity grading systems to be easy for clinicians to apply and understand and be standardised. 43 Knowledge can be disseminated through literature, clinical guidelines and professional society recommendations and protocols.…”

The development and evaluation of an evidence-based guideline programme to improve care in a paediatric emergency department

“…By using local experts to either adapt a national or develop a new guideline, we were able to leverage peer influence in driving adoption 2 32. Through this local effort, we were able to avoid barriers to guideline implementation such as incompatibility of recommendations with local values, lack of credibility of guideline developer(s) with end users and recommendations not well integrated into the workflow 7 8 33 34.…”