2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10882-016-9514-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Relationship between Quality of Life, Adaptive Behavior and Support Needs

Abstract: This document is the author's post-print version, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer-review process. Some differences between the published version and this version may remain and you are advised to consult the published version if you wish to cite from it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moderate correlation between adaptive and QOL domains were found, with lower scores in adaptive' self-direction and responsibility domains, although signifi cant and positive [17,20]. Adaptive behavior is the strongest predictor for a life with quality [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moderate correlation between adaptive and QOL domains were found, with lower scores in adaptive' self-direction and responsibility domains, although signifi cant and positive [17,20]. Adaptive behavior is the strongest predictor for a life with quality [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Adaptive behavior is the strongest predictor for a life with quality [23]. The analysis between supports needs and QOL domains' correlations showed stronger scores between domestic and community activities, and weak scores with wellbeing eventually explained by the mismatch between supports needs and supports received [4,20]. The personal development domain showed the strongest correlations with adaptive behavior and supports needs [20,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A QV inclui as noções de autodeterminação, inclusão, capacitação e igualdade entre todos (Schalock & Verdugo, 2002), proporcionando uma linguagem comum e universal capaz de dimensionar as pessoas com deficiência num quadro social e ecológico (Simões, Santos, Biscaia, & Thompson, 2016), que combate a discriminação e refresca a noção da capacitação das pessoas com DI.…”
unclassified