2018
DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201701626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Reactivity of Fullerenes Through the Activation Strain Model

Abstract: The Activation Strain Model of reactivity nowadays constitutes a powerful tool to aid quantitative understanding of chemical reactions, and also their design. This approach, combined with the Energy Decomposition Analysis method, has been really helpful for our current understanding of different fundamental transformations in chemistry. This Microreview illustrates the usefulness of this methodology in providing more insight into the chemistry of fullerenes. To this end, representative recent applications, ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior has also been observed not only in our previousw ork focusedo nt he strongly relatedH 2 activation mediated by geminal B/N FLPs, [13] but also in completely different processes, such as pericyclic reactions. [29] Interestingly,t he interaction energy between the deformed reactants (DE int ), which is rather similar fora ll systems along the entire reactionc oordinate, only becomes significantly different at the corresponding transition states where it increases (i.e.,b ecomesm ore stabilizing) in the order E = N < P < Sb. This is exactly the opposite trend to the activation barriers,w hich strongly suggestst hat the observed reactivity trend is not related to the interaction between the reactants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior has also been observed not only in our previousw ork focusedo nt he strongly relatedH 2 activation mediated by geminal B/N FLPs, [13] but also in completely different processes, such as pericyclic reactions. [29] Interestingly,t he interaction energy between the deformed reactants (DE int ), which is rather similar fora ll systems along the entire reactionc oordinate, only becomes significantly different at the corresponding transition states where it increases (i.e.,b ecomesm ore stabilizing) in the order E = N < P < Sb. This is exactly the opposite trend to the activation barriers,w hich strongly suggestst hat the observed reactivity trend is not related to the interaction between the reactants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis can be applied to single geometries or multiple geometries along a scan or reaction coordinate, to provide information on the nature of interaction between the fragments and the potential energy surface. This method has been widely applied for a broad range of chemical systems such as cycloadditions, ene reactions, metal complexes and catalysis, organocatalysis, and addition and substitution reactions …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis can be applied to single geometries or multiple geometries along a scan or reaction coordinate, to provide information on the nature of interaction between the fragments and the potential energy surface. This method has been widely applied for a broad range of chemical systems such as cycloadditions, [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] ene reactions, [19] metal complexes and catalysis, [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] organocatalysis, [28][29][30][31] and addition [32] and substitution reactions. [33][34][35] The implementation of a DIAS analysis is straight forward and can be performed using any electronic structure software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ΔVelstat and ΔEoi are associated with covalent and ionic contributions to the bonding, respectively. [5][6][7]22,23 Finally, if the density functional used in the calculations contains dispersion corrections (not in our case), then in Eq. ( 2) there is another term, Edisp, that takes into account the interactions due to dispersion forces.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%