1995
DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(95)00140-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the radar backscattering from flooded and nonflooded Amazonian forests: Results from canopy backscatter modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
85
1
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
85
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of flooded herbaceous vegetation with low emergent biomass, a vertical incidence angle may diminish the probability of a first bounce in vegetation and a second one in the water (or vice versa), increasing the probability of reaching water. This observation is in marked contrast to what happens in forest environments, where for a given polarization and frequency, double-bounce scattering is more important in steep than in shallow incidence angles scenes [12,25,67].…”
Section: Scenecontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…In the case of flooded herbaceous vegetation with low emergent biomass, a vertical incidence angle may diminish the probability of a first bounce in vegetation and a second one in the water (or vice versa), increasing the probability of reaching water. This observation is in marked contrast to what happens in forest environments, where for a given polarization and frequency, double-bounce scattering is more important in steep than in shallow incidence angles scenes [12,25,67].…”
Section: Scenecontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Richards et al (1987) reported the bright return of flooded forest in L band by corner reflection between trunks and water surface beneath the canopy. Early results from Hess et al (1995) deal with the mapping of inundated areas of the central Amazon floodplain with the SIR-C SAR, and Wang et al (1995) compared C-and L-bands with respect to the detection of flooding in Amazonian forests. Smith et al (1995Smith et al ( , 1996 estimated discharge from braided glacial rivers with ERS-1 SAR images.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies employing multi-polarized data indicate advantages of like-polarization (HH or VV) for the seperation of flooded and non-flooded forests [11,32]. According to [12,30], the backscatter ratio between flooded and non-flooded forest is higher at HH polarization than at VV polarization. Backscatter is generally lower for cross-polarization (HV or VH) as depolarization does not make for ideal corner reflectors [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%