2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2005.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the process of adaptation to car-use reduction goals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although scenario 2 prosed a considerably higher reduction goal to the participants, there was only a slight increase of the total reduction. This finding might be explained by a cost hierarchy present in change options, implying that generally people first select alternatives that are less costly in terms of money and effort, and that additional change is more costly and therefore more difficult to achieve (Loukopoulos et al, 2006). It might also indicate a 'shock effect' in scenario 1, that is, the introduction of the measure has an effect apart from the total credits available (Dogterom et al, 2017).…”
Section: Data Collection Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although scenario 2 prosed a considerably higher reduction goal to the participants, there was only a slight increase of the total reduction. This finding might be explained by a cost hierarchy present in change options, implying that generally people first select alternatives that are less costly in terms of money and effort, and that additional change is more costly and therefore more difficult to achieve (Loukopoulos et al, 2006). It might also indicate a 'shock effect' in scenario 1, that is, the introduction of the measure has an effect apart from the total credits available (Dogterom et al, 2017).…”
Section: Data Collection Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first survey was followed up with another in which explicit car-use reduction goals were induced (Loukopoulos et al, 2004c). Thus, it was assumed that only the size of the car-use reduction goal would determine choice of adaptation alternative, not the particular TDM measure that was implemented.…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…138,000) (Loukopoulos et al, 2004c;Meland, 1994). A population-based sample of car owners (68.6% response rate) answered questions about how much they had changed car use (size of change goal) and what changes they had made.…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It occurs at all times of day, all days of the week, and the destinations are numerous (Schlich et al 2004). Also, unlike work and educational travel, it often is categorized as ''other'' or discretionary (Frank et al 2007;Loukopoulos et al 2006). Indeed recreational travel has been likened to discretionary expenditure: ''It is enjoyed only after the required travel is accomplished'' (Mallett and McGuckin 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small number of studies have investigated leisure travel decision-making under scenarios designed to reduce private vehicle use (Garling et al 2000;Loukopoulos et al 2006). Loukopoulos et al (2006) examined people's responses to travel demand management strategies for trips of different purposes. For leisure trips, the most popular alternative to car use was to utilize a different transport mode or to trip chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%