Understanding the Possible Contamination of Ancient Starch Residues by Adjacent Sediments and Modern Plants in Northern China

Abstract

Abstract:The potential contamination of ancient residues from both modern plant sources and sediments adjacent to archaeological contexts can complicate interpretation in the field of starch grain analysis, thus affecting the sustainable use of the method in archaeobotany. In this study, we examined two potential sources of contamination at a wheat field in Shandong Province and a maize field in Beijing, the Nanzhuangtou site in Hebei Province and the Zhuannian site in Beijing in Northern China. Surface soils from active farmland and its surrounds, as well as deposits from clearly-defined cultural layers, overlying layers, and underlayers at the archaeological sites were subjected to starch grain analysis. No starches were recovered from any of the 16 surface soil samples from fields of wheat and maize, or their environs. This outcome indicates that starches do not preserve well in active surface soils. Further results from the analysis of 33 samples from the two sites demonstrate that starches do not occur in either the overlying layers or underlayers of cultural deposits. Thus, starch grains extracted from the surface residues of artifacts were not deposited from adjacent sediments after the artifacts were abandoned or buried. Further, cultural sediments contained fewer starch grains than the surfaces of artifacts in the same horizon. Thus, if any starch grains on the surfaces of tools are the result of contamination, ancient cultural sediments are the primary source. In conclusion, we offer insights for the prevention of misinterpretation of extraneous residues and sustainable development for the use of starch grain analysis.

Late Precolonial Culinary Practices: Starch Analysis on Griddles from the Northern Caribbean

“…The rationale regarding sampling soil near an artifact was that if residues found on artifacts are not apparent in the soil, then the starches extracted from the artifact's surfaces were more likely to have resulted from use of the artifact. Other studies determined starches recovered from sediments that were near an artifact related to transference from the artifact to the surrounding soils (Ma et al 2017;Pearsall et al 2004;Piperno et al 2000). However, we excavated the artifacts from Palmetto Junction from classic middens, which concerned us because of the possibility for ancient depositional contamination.…”

Determining precolonial botanical foodways: starch recovery and analysis, Long Island, The Bahamas

“…Studied microbotanical remains such as phytoliths, spores, and pollen are naturally dispersed in large quantities throughout the environment without human intervention; in contrast, starches are typically released from plant organs through human caused processes or in limited cases by decomposition (Beck and Torrence, 2006, Ma, et al, 2017, Pagán-Jiménez, 2007. Thus, the relation between artifacts, human behaviors, and plant use appear to have a strong correlation seen best through starch analysis (Holst, et al, 2007, Pagán-Jiménez, 2009, Pearsall, et al, 2004, Perry, 2004.…”

Microscopic Analysis of Starch Grains and its Applications in the Archaeology of the Stone Age

“…Other ways to reduce contamination are complicated and expensive to purchase. Within this group can be included air filtration, sticky mats, restricted access, barrier curtains and airlocks (Crowther et al, 2014;Herzog, 2014;Ma et al, 2017).…”