Learning Policy, Doing Policy: Interactions Between Public Policy Theory, Practice and Teaching 2021
DOI: 10.22459/lpdp.2021.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the policymaking enterprise: Foucault among the bureaucrats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Schneider and Ingram, "policy designs are produced through a dynamic historical process involving the social constructions of knowledge and identities of target populations power relationships, and institutions" (1997,5). The critical point here is that the knowledge involved in policymaking is a socially constructed phenomenon 2 emerging from interaction within social networks (Charon 1995;Hall 1972;Oliver 2012;Ritchie 2021;Kuhn and Hacking 2012). These constructions both enable and limit human insight, shaping the knowledge we bring to policymaking (Schneider and Ingram, 1993) and which, through radically recursive processes, become hard-wired into policy designs themselves as a priori epistemic commitments that present as both neutral and universal.…”
Section: Knowledge and Policy Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Schneider and Ingram, "policy designs are produced through a dynamic historical process involving the social constructions of knowledge and identities of target populations power relationships, and institutions" (1997,5). The critical point here is that the knowledge involved in policymaking is a socially constructed phenomenon 2 emerging from interaction within social networks (Charon 1995;Hall 1972;Oliver 2012;Ritchie 2021;Kuhn and Hacking 2012). These constructions both enable and limit human insight, shaping the knowledge we bring to policymaking (Schneider and Ingram, 1993) and which, through radically recursive processes, become hard-wired into policy designs themselves as a priori epistemic commitments that present as both neutral and universal.…”
Section: Knowledge and Policy Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He posits the source of this failure in the state exclusion of local/particular forms of knowledge and practice, in favor of the high modernist epistemology that emerged in Europe in the 18th and 19th centuries. At the core of his critique of modernist statecraft is a radical cultural dissonance (Ritchie 2021) manifest in a contest between these different ways of knowing and doing -"modernist" knowledge, universal and imperious; and the local and particular knowledges that orientate and organize social networks and the lives of the members of those networks. This epistemic imposition/suppression dynamic is the primary phenomenon that Scott problematizes in his analysis of statecraft.…”
Section: James Scott and The Problem Of Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation