Understanding the Performance of Bluetooth Mesh: Reliability, Delay, and Scalability Analysis

Abstract

This article evaluates the quality-of-service performance and scalability of the recently released Bluetooth Mesh protocol and provides general guidelines on its use and configuration. Through extensive simulations, we analyzed the impact of the configuration of all the different protocol's parameters on the end-to-end reliability, delay, and scalability. In particular, we focused on the structure of the packet broadcast process, which takes place in time intervals known as Advertising Events and Scanning Events. Results indicate a high degree of interdependence among all the different timing parameters involved in both the scanning and the advertising processes and show that the correct operation of the protocol greatly depends on the compatibility between their configurations. We also demonstrated that introducing randomization in these timing parameters, as well as varying the duration of the Advertising Events, reduces the drawbacks of the flooding propagation mechanism implemented by the protocol. Using data collected from a real office environment, we also studied the behavior of the protocol in the presence of WLAN interference. It was shown that Bluetooth Mesh is vulnerable to external interference, even when implementing the standardized limitation of using only 3 out of the 40 Bluetooth Low Energy frequency channels. We observed that the achievable average delay is relatively low, of around 250 ms for over 10 hops under the worst simulated network conditions. However, results proved that scalability is especially challenging for Bluetooth Mesh since it is prone to broadcast storm, hindering the communication reliability for denser deployments.

Experimental Evaluation of 6BLEMesh: IPv6-Based BLE Mesh Networks

“…Another work evaluated analytically the effect of different network settings on network reliability, delay and scalability [ 40 ]. The authors also simulated Bluetooth Mesh functionality in the presence of WLAN interference.…”

Convergence of Blockchain and Edge Computing for Secure and Scalable IIoT Critical Infrastructures in Industry 4.0

“…In addition to heterogeneous IIoT devices, the networks connecting various IIoT devices also have different protocols across the entire protocol stack. For example, near-field communication (NFC), back-scatter communications, and Bluetooth have often been adopted for short-range communications, while WiFi, Low Power WAN and cellular communications (e.g., 4G and 5G) have been used to connect IoT devices over a longer distance [121], [122]. Moreover, a proliferation of massive structured and nonstructured IIoT data also leads to the difficulties in data storage and analytics.…”

Sounding and modeling of the indoor aerial acoustic transmission channel

“…Short range communications have been a major asset over the past three decades, especially complementing wireline communications of computers and mobile phones. In this regard, applications set out from optical infrared using the IrDA (Infrared data Association) protocol 10,11 which was quickly replaced by radio systems such as Bluetooth 12,13 which was later complemented by NFC (Near Field Communication). 14,15 Recently, UWB communication 16,17 which has suffered from a checkered history has become attractive, again.…”