Understanding the origins and variability of the fuel consumption gap: lessons learned from laboratory tests and a real-driving campaign

Abstract

Background: Divergence in fuel consumption (FC) between the type-approval tests and real-world driving trips, known also as the FC gap, is a well-known issue and Europe is preparing the field for tackling it. The present study focuses on the monitoring of the FC of a single vehicle throughout 1 year with 20 different drivers and almost 14,000 km driven with the aim to analyze and quantify the true intrinsic variability in the FC gap coming from environmental and traffic conditions and driving factors. In addition, the regression model has been developed to evaluate the importance of these different factors on the FC gap's variability. Results:The 1-year FC gap measured in this study was 29% while driver's averages were in the range from 16 to 106%. The regression model developed had R 2 equal to 90.4 meaning that more than 90% of the FC gap's variance can be explained with this model and factors measured in this study. The results of the model showed that among all factors analyzed the highest contribution in the FC gap's variance is coming from the average vehicle speed (16.6%), followed by the road grade (13.4%), and trip distance (10.1%). Indeed, the highest FC gaps are measured when the average vehicle speeds were below 20 km/h, the average distance-weighted road grades above 1%, and the trip distances below 5 km. In addition, the impact of driver factors is not negligible (25%) and the highest FC gap is measured for the trips where average positive acceleration was higher than 0.7 m/s 2 (indicating aggressive driving) and the electric power demand higher than 800 W. Conclusions:The future lifetime on-board fuel consumption reporting is a crucial instrument that will allow the monitoring of the evolution of the FC gap and ensuring that it does not increase over time. The analysis presented in this study is a basis for setting up a more detailed and refined prediction model, which could assist the European Commission in closely monitoring the gap and the underlying factors generating it.

The Impact of Fleet Electrification on Carbon Emissions: A Case Study from Poland

“…Consequently, this paper confirms the existence of the fuel consumption gap that is discussed in detail in Ref. [33].…”

Exhaust Emissions and Energy Consumption Analysis of Conventional, Hybrid, and Electric Vehicles in Real Driving Cycles

“…The authors of [13] have compared 13 light duty Euro 6b vehicles (eight diesel and five gasoline), both in the laboratory conditions on a chassis dynamometer and under actual traffic conditions using the PEMS equipment. The authors of [14] have attempted to determine the sources of the discrepancies on the results of the fuel consumption tests performed in the laboratory and in the road test. They monitored the fuel consumption of a single vehicle for the period of one year using 20 different drivers.…”

Vehicle Fuel Optimization Under Real-World Driving Conditions: An Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach

“…The reason behind this is that those models are known as whitebox because they directly provide the influence of the input in the output [18]. This is shown in [19], where the authors predict the fuel consumption gap between type-approval tests and real-world driving trips, using the information of one vehicle during one year, and with 20 different drivers. With that, they build a multiple linear regression model that takes into account driver-related factors as well as environmental and traffic factors in order to predict the fuel consumption gap.…”