Understanding the nature of the economic game ultimatum through the prism of personality traits

Abstract

Ultimatum game belongs to the classical economic experiments, frequently used to study altruism and pro-social behavior. The objective of the research is to understand relations between the personality and the ultimatum game from the responder´s perspective. Participants (N=224, females 62%) filled the web-based questionnaires on Hexaco-PI and hypothetic minimal acceptable sum as respondents in the ultimatum game. Data was analyzed by means of the structural equation model and the binominal regression model, using the narrow traits as input variables. Interestingly, the most frequented value of minimal acceptable amount was a fair offer (50 % of the total sum). A fair offer was expected by 50 % of females and 42 % of males; what erodes the traditional thesis of economic rationality, according to which any offer higher than 0 should be accepted. Hence, people have natural tendency to expect and require a fair deal. Results from the logit model show that the minimal acceptable sum in the ultimatum game is predicted, firstly, by liveliness and sociability (wider trait extraversion) and secondly, by sentimentality and dependence (wider trait emotionality). In other words, tendency to expect and require fair offer manifests at optimistic and joyful people able to create strong emotional connections. Logit model´s results were reconfirmed by the structural equation models, where wider traits extraversion and emotionality were found statistically significant. Findings have interesting implications as regards the understanding of underlying psychological processes in the frame of altruistic decision-making.

Assessing manifestations of bossing in the context of personality traits of business managers

“…Based on Big Five, each person’s personality can be described through five characteristics or traits, namely neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness, using complex statistical methods. Beginnings of this model date back to Fiske (1949) , and have since been further developed and amended by many other authors (e.g., Janovská, 2011 ; Ziaran et al, 2021 ). Camps et al (2016) used this particular method in their research, connecting it with the issue of abusive supervision (i.e., bossing).…”