2009
DOI: 10.1177/1367006909339814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the nature and outcomes of early bilingualism: Romance languages as heritage languages

Abstract: In this introduction to the special issue on Romance languages as heritage languages, I aim to contextualize the scope of this issue and the contribution it makes to the emerging field of linguistic studies to heritage language bilingualism. Key issues pertaining to the empirical study and epistemology of heritage language bilingualism are presented as well as a critical introduction to the individual articles that comprise this issue.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
187
0
16

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 358 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
187
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…These are simultaneous or sequential unbalanced bilinguals, whose home (minority) language is the weaker of the two (cf. Rothman 2009;Benmamoun et al 2013a;b;Kupisch 2013;Scontras et al 2015;Kupisch & Rothman 2016;Montrul 2016). Heritage languages, whose speakers are numerous and widely available, present a unique testbed for issues of acquisition, maintenance/robustness, and transfer within linguistic theory.…”
Section: Heritage Language Speakersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are simultaneous or sequential unbalanced bilinguals, whose home (minority) language is the weaker of the two (cf. Rothman 2009;Benmamoun et al 2013a;b;Kupisch 2013;Scontras et al 2015;Kupisch & Rothman 2016;Montrul 2016). Heritage languages, whose speakers are numerous and widely available, present a unique testbed for issues of acquisition, maintenance/robustness, and transfer within linguistic theory.…”
Section: Heritage Language Speakersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the former subsection, I also include a brief introduction to how gender, number, and definiteness are typically realized in a Norwegian structure. 12 Please recall…”
Section: Diachronic Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the former subsection, I also include a brief introduction to how gender, number, and definiteness are typically realized in a Norwegian structure. 12 Please recall that when referring to specific examples, data from Haugen [6] are accompanied by the page number where the examples can be found, and data from CANS [7] by the informant code.…”
Section: Diachronic Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have in mind heritage speakers: (relatively) unbalanced bilinguals who shifted from their first language (their heritage language) to their dominant language early in childhood. 1 According to most definitions, heritage speakers are individuals who were raised in homes where a language other than the dominant community language was spoken, resulting in some degree of bilingualism in both the heritage language and the dominant language (Valdés 2000;Rothman 2009;Benmamoun et al 2013a;Scontras et al 2015;Montrul 2016). This relatively unconstrained definition makes it almost impossible to give a concrete model for a heritage speaker, but this is by design: heritage language proficiency falls along a continuum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%