2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep31418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the molecular basis of substrate binding specificity of PTB domains

Abstract: Protein-protein interactions mediated by phosphotyrosine binding (PTB) domains play a crucial role in various cellular processes. In order to understand the structural basis of substrate recognition by PTB domains, multiple explicit solvent atomistic simulations of 100ns duration have been carried out on 6 PTB-peptide complexes with known binding affinities. MM/PBSA binding energy values calculated from these MD trajectories and residue based statistical pair potential score show good correlation with the expe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…terminus, in contrast with previous reports [6,46]. Our data conclude that nsSNPs in Core1 did not disrupt Core2 and vice versa, indicating that both binding pockets have independent functional roles in their interactions with NPXY motifs, and dysfunction of either binding pocket is sufficient to initiate pathogenesis of CCMs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…terminus, in contrast with previous reports [6,46]. Our data conclude that nsSNPs in Core1 did not disrupt Core2 and vice versa, indicating that both binding pockets have independent functional roles in their interactions with NPXY motifs, and dysfunction of either binding pocket is sufficient to initiate pathogenesis of CCMs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The two in-frame deletions are the exception to this observance. Both in-frame N-terminal deletions resulted in alteration of Core1 and Core2, strongly suggesting that the β1 strand/α2 helix at the N terminus may be equally essential for maintaining structure stability of the entire PTB domain as the C terminus, in contrast with previous reports [6,46]. Our data conclude that nsSNPs in Core1 did not disrupt Core2 and vice versa, indicating that both binding pockets have independent functional roles in their interactions with NPXY motifs, and dysfunction of either binding pocket is sufficient to initiate pathogenesis of CCMs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…As the first to test this approach on ENM PC predictions, this work establishes a baseline of AUC performance for future predictive models. To provide a comparative metric for a problem of similar complexity, protein-protein binding predictions, Sain et al 35 report an AUROC score of 0.7, which is typically considered strong for problems of this complexity. Related, the Youden index defines the threshold in the ROC curve that gives the best performance (Figure 2b).…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loop connecting helices B and C is the longest in our model and contains a region of conformational heterogeneity, as evidenced by high B-factors and the absence of clear electron density. Intriguingly, the B-C loop harbors an NPxY sequence, which is the canonical phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain-interacting motif (86). The presence of this motif on a flexible, solvent-exposed loop in MavE may suggest a role for this protein in recruiting PTB domains, which predominantly exist on adaptor or scaffold proteins (49).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%