Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04567-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the meanings of citations using sentiment, role, and citation function classifications

Abstract: Traditional citation analyses use quantitative methods only, even though there is meaning in the sentences containing citations within the text. This article analyzes three citation meanings: sentiment, role, and function. We compare citation meanings patterns between fields of science and propose an appropriate deep learning model to classify the three meanings automatically at once. The data comes from Indonesian journal articles covering five different areas of science: food, energy, health, computer, and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the data is available, the next step is to select the algorithm to be incorporated into the model ( Budi & Yaniasih, 2022 ; Jafarian et al, 2021 ; Kaur et al, 2021 ). In general, machine learning algorithms such as Naive Bayes, SVM, and neural networks are utilized in sentiment analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the data is available, the next step is to select the algorithm to be incorporated into the model ( Budi & Yaniasih, 2022 ; Jafarian et al, 2021 ; Kaur et al, 2021 ). In general, machine learning algorithms such as Naive Bayes, SVM, and neural networks are utilized in sentiment analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sentiment analysis of citations has attracted particular attention for two main reasons: First, to improve bibliometric metrics by focusing primarily on the quality rather than quantity of citations, with the aim of reducing bias and providing evidence-based support for writing. Second, to detect non-reproducible research, i.e., the identification of research papers or results that cannot be replicated or verified by other researchers, especially in the biomedical field, where unfavorable attitudes may be early indicators of the non-reproducibility of research, thus saving time and resources [28]. Therefore, although positive polarity citations have a significant impact on science, as they can enhance the validity and reliability of findings and even promote the reputation and career of researchers, the study by Catalini et al [29], however, equally highlights that negative citations can also play an important role in science.…”
Section: Scientific Citation Analysis (Sca) 331 Citation Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, they performed intent classification on the SciCite dataset and achieved an 85% accuracy using XLNet. Budi & Yaniasih, conducted experiments on 9173 citation sentences from five science disciplines: Food, Energy, Health, Social, and Computer [6]. They employed a CNN-based multi-task learning approach for citation sentiment classification (positive, negative, and neutral), citation role classification (supplemental, result, method, and data), and citation function classification (introducing, relating, utilizing, explaining, and comparing).…”
Section: Mercier Et Al Proposed Xlnet Based Impactcite To Perform Cit...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limited approach fails to provide a comprehensive understanding since there may be preceding or following sentences that discuss the same citing paper with different intentions. Consequently, a single-sentence context is insufficient for thorough citation analysis [6]. To overcome the limitation posed by a single citation sentence or a fixed window of citation sentences, we advocate to consider multi-sentence-based citation context along with its potential intents [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%