2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the intrinsic water wettability of graphite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
244
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(284 citation statements)
references
References 245 publications
(420 reference statements)
33
244
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was demonstrated that the presence of graphene layer on the Cu substrate delays the wetting process, as compared to the uncoated Cu substrate, while wetting behavior of liquid tin on the C Gn /Cu substrate was found to be very similar to that on uncoated pure Cu. Thus, the results obtained in Ref 20 did not clearly confirm the existence of graphene wetting transparency effect with liquid tin as it was previously reported for inorganic liquids or water in Ref [14][15][16][17][18][19]. On the other hand, the results of structural characterization performed by Sobczak et al (Ref 20) on crosssectioned solidified sessile drop couples showed the presence of interfacial intermetallic compound layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was demonstrated that the presence of graphene layer on the Cu substrate delays the wetting process, as compared to the uncoated Cu substrate, while wetting behavior of liquid tin on the C Gn /Cu substrate was found to be very similar to that on uncoated pure Cu. Thus, the results obtained in Ref 20 did not clearly confirm the existence of graphene wetting transparency effect with liquid tin as it was previously reported for inorganic liquids or water in Ref [14][15][16][17][18][19]. On the other hand, the results of structural characterization performed by Sobczak et al (Ref 20) on crosssectioned solidified sessile drop couples showed the presence of interfacial intermetallic compound layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…To our best knowledge, reported literature data on wetting properties of graphene-coated surfaces are limited to water and organic liquids showing the wetting behavior and the contact angle values similar to those of uncoated surfaces (Ref [14][15][16][17][18]). This phenomenon, described by Rafiee et al (Ref 19) as the graphene wetting transparency, has been also theoretically predicted by molecular dynamic simulations (Ref 19) and confirmed experimentally for different low-temperature liquids and various types of substrate materials [Cu foil (Ref 16), HOPG (Ref 17), graphite (Ref 17), Si (Ref 19)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is reported that wettability of carbon materials (graphene and graphite) can be affected by the accumulation of airborne contaminants (mainly hydrocarbons) deposited on the surface with time, as reflected by an increase in contact angle (CA) of aqueous droplets on those surfaces after being exposed to air (with the biggest CA change seen within 10-15 min). 44 Obviously, the time scale of the effect will depend on the environment (cleanliness) and so we also studied the time effect on the wettability of HOPG by placing a droplet of either 5 mM Fe(ClO 4 ) 3 solution (in 0.1 M HClO 4 ) or pure water on AM HOPG surfaces that were cleaved and subsequently exposed in air for different time. As seen from Figure 5, the CA of the Fe(ClO 4 ) 3 solution on freshly cleaved HOPG surface is smaller than observed previously (and also in this study) with pure water (vide infra), 9, 37 possibly due to the surface tension changes upon addition of electrolytes, 45 which can influence the CA, according to Young's equation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, a fully graphitic carbon normally has a water contact angle of ca. 90°(after long-time exposure to air [86,87]), but this form of carbon can be obtained only by heat-treatment in Ar at 2000°C or higher [1,32]. In this work, the carbon powders were heat-treated only up to 1500°C in N 2 , so their surfaces are expected to be less hydrophobic than graphite, with a water contact angle of <90°.…”
Section: Water Vapor Sorption (Wvs) Studymentioning
confidence: 98%