2018
DOI: 10.1504/ijesb.2018.094272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the international strategic alliances of SMEs: a case-study approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, 2013; Huang et al. , 2015; Liu and Yang, 2019; Prabhudesai and Prasad, 2018). While possession of both tangible and intangible resources can make a firm an attractive SA partner and hence promote SA formation, we will argue below that the two resource types will have differential implications for SA formation.…”
Section: Conceptual Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, 2013; Huang et al. , 2015; Liu and Yang, 2019; Prabhudesai and Prasad, 2018). While possession of both tangible and intangible resources can make a firm an attractive SA partner and hence promote SA formation, we will argue below that the two resource types will have differential implications for SA formation.…”
Section: Conceptual Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior literature has often classified resources into two broad categoriestangible (can be seen and quantified including many types of physical assets) and intangible (difficult to quantify and not easily separable from the firm, including many types of knowledge assets or reputation) (Marr and Roos, 2005). According to the RBT, every firm possesses a combination of tangible and intangible resources, whose quantum and quality determine its success in the marketplace (Bretherton and Chaston, 2005;Galbreath, 2005;Greco et al, 2013;Huang et al, 2015;Liu and Yang, 2019;Prabhudesai and Prasad, 2018). While possession of both tangible and intangible resources can make a firm an attractive SA partner and hence promote SA formation, we will argue below that the two resource types will have differential implications for SA formation.…”
Section: Conceptual Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like previous research, such as , we used a single case study for a more in-depth exploration and understanding of the phenomena (see also Prabhudesai & Prasad, 2018). The main goal was to obtain empirical insights from SMEs in a specific context as the case (Bartlett & Vavrus, 2016).…”
Section: Research Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, networks became divided into business networks, social networks, and institutional networks (Oparaocha, 2015). The role of different alliances for SME internationalisation and of diverse virtual and global networks for SMEs grew in the globalisation-Internet era and triggered further institutional discussions (e.g., Prabhudesai & Prasad, 2018, see also Jin, Ramkumar & Chou, 2018). IBAs represent an important institutional network actor that provide support to the international activities of SMEs (Costa et al, 2017a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As suggested by the Social Exchange theory, presence of trust will facilitate more and better-quality communication, helping the performance of the alliance through achievement of synergies, goal attainment and satisfaction. Equally importantly, greater communication will enhance learning (a partnerlevel performance proxy) and competitive benefits for SMEs, especially if the alliance involves sharing and use of tacit resources that requires close cooperation and coordination across partners (Gaur et al, 2011;Prabhudesai and Prasad, 2018a;Scalera et al, 2020). Hence:…”
Section: Exchange Climate: Communication and Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%