2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the interactions between lithium polysulfides and N-doped graphene using density functional theory calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

21
187
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 363 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
21
187
0
Order By: Relevance
“…67 To investigate the affinitive interaction between pyrrolic N site and lithium polysuldes, ab initio calculation was performed based on density functional theory (DFT). Three soluble polysuldes were used in the simulation (Li 2 S x , x ¼ 3, 4, 8), and they formed ring-like conguration with two Li + ions distributed on each side of the ring aer optimization (Fig.…”
Section: 61mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…67 To investigate the affinitive interaction between pyrrolic N site and lithium polysuldes, ab initio calculation was performed based on density functional theory (DFT). Three soluble polysuldes were used in the simulation (Li 2 S x , x ¼ 3, 4, 8), and they formed ring-like conguration with two Li + ions distributed on each side of the ring aer optimization (Fig.…”
Section: 61mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thec hemical shift of Li 2 S 8 -G is around 0.0 ppm, similar to that of pure Li 2 S 8 solution with the presence of solvents and co-salts. [10] Nevertheless,i ti sn oticed that the broad peak is obviously asymmetric and there is as mall but unignorable split. )a re induced to the carbon lattice at different topological sites (e.g., zigzag edge,a rmchair edge,k ink, and defect), resulting in al arge variety in the local environment surrounding Li.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the calculated D Li+ values increased from 8.0 × 10 −8 (C1), 3.0 × 10 −8 (C2), and 6.8 × 10 −8 cm 2 s −1 (A) for the routine PE separator to 1.6 × 10 −7 (C1), 3.2 × 10 −8 (C2), and 7.6 × 10 −8 (A) for the KB/PE membrane, and 2.7 × 10 −7 (C1), 4.2 × 10 −8 (C2), and 1.4 × 10 −7 cm 2 s −1 (A) for the KB‐TPS/PE separator, which is consistent with the measured Li + conductance results (Figure 2B). This improvement in the Li + diffusion coefficient of the modified separator was also proofed by the EIS technique . The details were given in the Figure S7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%