Understanding the influence of political orientation, social network, and economic recovery on COVID-19 vaccine uptake among Americans

Feng, Hao; Shao, Wanyun

doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.066

Cited by 27 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is evidence that closely knit communities have reported relatively fewer COVID-19 cases and deaths because of the spread of information about preventive measures (Fraser et al, 2021;Makridis and Freeman, 2021;Pitas and Ehmer, 2020). In a study on COVID-19 vaccine uptake among Americans, Hao and Shao (2022) found that people are more likely to get vaccinated if a higher proportion of their family or close friends had already been vaccinated. An IMF study by Khan et al (2021), that used individual-level data from the COVID-19 Behavior Tracker, found that peers help in driving (and undermining) vaccine acceptance.…”

Section: Intra-household Dynamics and The Acceptance Of Vaccinesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intra-Household Dynamics and Attitudes toward Vaccines: Experimental and Survey Evidence from Zambia

Hoy¹,

Kanagavel²,

Cameron³

2022

Policy Research Working Papers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank and its affiliated organizations, or those of the Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent.

show abstract

Section: Intra-household Dynamics and The Acceptance Of Vaccinesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intra-Household Dynamics and Attitudes toward Vaccines: Experimental and Survey Evidence from Zambia

Hoy¹,

Kanagavel²,

Cameron³

2022

Policy Research Working Papers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The people who tend to be vaccinated derive social benefits from their various social groups' positive views on vaccination, leading to vaccine uptake to conform to group expectations. A previous study of Americans supports the argument by showing that residents are more likely to take the vaccine if they are from states with higher vaccination rates ( Hao and Shao, 2022 ). Furthermore, the magnitude of the effects for these individual-level factors depends on various scenarios at the country level.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 71%

A cross-national study of multilevel determinants on public fully vaccination against COVID-19

Feng

2023

Health & Place

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Still, skepticism, hesitancy, and resistance remain [ 22 – 24 ]. Research shows that individual vaccination decisions are related to personal characteristics and rooted in their public health and home state’s political and economic contexts [ 25 ]. Safe and effective vaccines are undoubtedly groundbreaking.…”

Section: Literature Review and Analysis Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Configurations for positive public behaviors in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis

et al. 2022

BMC Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The COVID-19 crisis poses considerable threats to public health, and exploring the key configuration conditions of the public behavior response is very important for emergency risk management. Objective This study attempts to reveal differences in the conditional configuration and mechanism of public behavior based on the proposed framework, further make up for the deficiencies of existing research in explaining such issues as “How to promote the public’s protective behavior or reduce the public’s excessive behavior?” and finally provide new evidence and ideas for the government to improve the emergency management system. Methods A total of 735 valid cases were obtained using an online survey and revealed the conditional configuration and mechanism of public behavior differences through a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis based on the proposed public behavioral framework. Results The results show that critical factors including risk communication, trust, risk perception, and negative emotions alone did not constitute a necessary condition for public protective or excessive behavior. The different configurations of influencing factors reveal the complexity of public behavioral risk management, and taking adequate measures to increase public trust and reduce negative public emotions constitute the core path of risk management to enhance positive public behavior. Conclusions The configurations of various influencing factors reveal the complexity of public behavioral risk management. For behavioral risk management, governments should focus on adapting to multiple conditions according to their situations and, under the “overall perspective,” formulate policies based on local conditions and further form a differentiated risk management path. Practically speaking, for the government, taking adequate measures to increase public trust and reduce negative public emotions is the core path of risk management to enhance positive public behavior.

show abstract

Understanding the influence of political orientation, social network, and economic recovery on COVID-19 vaccine uptake among Americans

Cited by 27 publications

References 56 publications

Intra-Household Dynamics and Attitudes toward Vaccines: Experimental and Survey Evidence from Zambia

Intra-Household Dynamics and Attitudes toward Vaccines: Experimental and Survey Evidence from Zambia

A cross-national study of multilevel determinants on public fully vaccination against COVID-19

Configurations for positive public behaviors in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About