Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2011 Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2018436.2018478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
286
1
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 504 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
286
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This case of multi-homed content-i.e., content that is served by multiple CDNs-requires an additional request mapping layer to route requests to CDNs selected for delivery [15,20,30]. A Meta-CDN service can be provided by third-party infrastructures, most prominently Conviva for video delivery [2,13] and Cedexis for general (web) services [1,17,30]. Within these Meta-CDNs, the request mapping function of a participating content provider is unknown.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This case of multi-homed content-i.e., content that is served by multiple CDNs-requires an additional request mapping layer to route requests to CDNs selected for delivery [15,20,30]. A Meta-CDN service can be provided by third-party infrastructures, most prominently Conviva for video delivery [2,13] and Cedexis for general (web) services [1,17,30]. Within these Meta-CDNs, the request mapping function of a participating content provider is unknown.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Known instances of third-party Meta-CDNs [15,22,23,30] provide services to implement custom and dynamic request mapping policies to direct traffic to the different CDNs. The characteristics of third-party Meta-CDNs have been studied in part on the example of Conviva [2,13,22] and Cedexis [17] as the prevalent operators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that the rate adaptation logic of clients is not specified in the DASH protocol. Naive DASH adaptation logics usually suffer from large quality variations or playback buffer underflow [3], which drastically deteriorates the quality of experience (QoE) of users [4]. Because the network bandwidth is highly dynamic, it is challenging to provide stable and high quality videos to ensure satisfactory user experience all the time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Video freezes caused by rebuffering: Dobrian et al [11] show that rebuffering has the largest impact on user engagement. Conviva [10] estimates the number of HAS sessions that suffer from video freezes at 27 percent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%