2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-29975-4_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Impact of Constraints: A Rank Based Fitness Function for Evolutionary Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of these is the non-dominated sorting algorithm, exemplified by the popular NSGA-II genetic algorithm implementation [9]. In Fresa, an alternative method is the assignment of fitness values based on the Hadamard product of the rankings with respect to the individual criteria [10]. A variation on this latter method is an alternative based on the Borda sum of those individual rankings.…”
Section: Features Of Fresamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of these is the non-dominated sorting algorithm, exemplified by the popular NSGA-II genetic algorithm implementation [9]. In Fresa, an alternative method is the assignment of fitness values based on the Hadamard product of the rankings with respect to the individual criteria [10]. A variation on this latter method is an alternative based on the Borda sum of those individual rankings.…”
Section: Features Of Fresamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variation on this latter method is an alternative based on the Borda sum of those individual rankings. These latter two fitness assignment methods tend to emphasise solutions found towards the ends of the Pareto frontier whereas the non-dominated sorting algorithm may lead to the ends of the frontier having less representation in the population [10]. The advantage of the Hadamard and Borda based fitness assignment methods is that they scale linearly with both the population size and the number of objectives whereas a non-dominance sorting approach scales as with .…”
Section: Features Of Fresamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al., 2015). Recently, using a new fitness function for multi-objective problems, the algorithm has been applied to integrated energy systems design for off-grid mining operations (Fraga and Amusat, 2016), also a dynamic optimisation problem. The algorithm can be summarised as follows: Algorithm 1: The strawberry plant propagation algorithm, adapted from Fraga and Amusat, 2016.…”
Section: The Strawberry Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weights assigned to the various process targets to produce a single objective function may be considered arbitrary in many cases, with decision-makers (brewers) not necessarily able to quantify a priori the relative importance of competing objectives. A number of multi-objective optimisation algorithms have been successfully applied to a wide range of engineering problems, where visualisation of the trade-offs can provide decision makers with valuable insight (Li et al, 2014;Gujarathi et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2015;Fraga and Amusat, 2016;Che at al., 2017;Maria and Crişan, 2017;Kessler et al, 2017). Systematically exploring the trade-off and visualising Pareto optimal temperature manipulations for efficient fermentation is desirable to gain insight and assist brewers with the selection of the most preferable operation strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation